CZAR vs QQQ
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. CZAR offers more diversification with 218 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | CZAR | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $2M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.42% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 218 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +3.77% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +4.52% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 9.6% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -13.4% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Themes ETFs | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 13, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
CZAR vs QQQ Performance
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF (CZAR) is a ETF from Themes ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year CZAR returned +4.52% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, CZAR is up 3.77% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 9.6% for CZAR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -13.4% for CZAR and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.43. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
CZAR charges 0.35% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $18 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, CZAR currently yields 1.42% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
CZAR and QQQ share 11 holdings out of 185 unique holdings combined, representing a 13.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, CZAR or QQQ?
CZAR has an expense ratio of 0.35% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, CZAR or QQQ?
Over the past year CZAR returned +4.52% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), CZAR annualized +11.86% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, CZAR or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 9.6% for CZAR. Worst drawdown: CZAR -13.4% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both CZAR and QQQ?
CZAR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.43, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between CZAR and QQQ?
CZAR and QQQ share 11 common holdings with a 13.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 185 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, CZAR or QQQ?
CZAR yields 1.42% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so CZAR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.