DARP vs IVV
Grizzle Growth ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DARP delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DARP | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $32M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.33% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 81 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +25.46% | +13.80% | |
| 1Y Return | +51.97% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +33.48% | +21.77% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.1% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -30.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Grizzle Investment Management LLC | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 17, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
DARP vs IVV Performance
Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) is a ETF from Grizzle Investment Management LLC and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DARP returned +51.97% while IVV returned +23.01%. Year to date, DARP is up 25.46% versus a gain of 13.80% for IVV.
Over three years, DARP compounded at +33.48% per year against +21.77% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, DARP has the edge at +33.48% annualized vs +7.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DARP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.3% for DARP and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DARP charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DARP currently yields 0.33% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DARP and IVV share 20 holdings out of 523 unique holdings combined, representing a 28.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DARP or IVV?
DARP has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DARP or IVV?
Over the past year DARP returned +51.97% vs +23.01% for IVV, so DARP leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), DARP annualized +33.48% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DARP or IVV?
DARP has been the more volatile fund at 22.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DARP -30.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DARP and IVV?
DARP and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DARP and IVV?
DARP and IVV share 20 common holdings with a 28.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 523 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DARP or IVV?
DARP yields 0.33% while IVV yields 1.09%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.