DARP vs QQQ
Grizzle Growth ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, DARP or QQQ?
DARP has been ahead.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. DARP led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DARP | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $46M | $498.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.34% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 88 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +29.28%Best | +22.95% |
| 1Y Return | +39.41%Best | +23.60% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +34.04%Best | +27.53% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +16.67% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.4% | 17.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -30.3% | -22.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.1 years | $24,055Best | $20,785 |
| Top 10 Weight | 55.9% | 47.2%Best |
| Fund Family | Grizzle Investment Management LLC | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 17, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Aug 28, 2023 to Oct 9, 2026 (3.1 years).
DARP vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.1 years both funds cover.
DARP vs QQQ Performance
Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) is an ETF from Grizzle Investment Management LLC and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year DARP returned +39.41% while QQQ returned +23.60%. Year to date, DARP is up 29.28% versus a gain of 22.95% for QQQ.
Over three years, DARP compounded at +34.04% per year against +27.53% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DARP has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.4% compared with 17.3% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -30.3% for DARP and -22.8% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DARP charges 0.75% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $18 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DARP currently yields 0.34% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
48.3% of DARP's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 43.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings DARP also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
12 positions in common, counted across the 43 positions we hold weights for in DARP and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 88 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 84 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for DARP (54.3% of the fund), and 21 for DARP that do not appear in QQQ (39.6%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DARP | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 8.74% | 8.45% | 0.29% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 8.77% | 4.85% | 3.92% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 9.71% | 3.15% | 6.56% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 7.69% | 4.41% | 3.28% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 3.11% | 7.80% | 4.69% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 2.28% | 5.88% | 3.60% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.74% | 3.07% | 1.33% |
| INTCIntel Corporation | 1.22% | 2.28% | 1.06% |
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 1.57% | 1.60% | 0.03% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 1.81% | 1.19% | 0.62% |
48.3% of DARP is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DARP or QQQ?
DARP has an expense ratio of 0.75% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $57 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DARP or QQQ?
Over the past year DARP returned +39.41% vs +23.60% for QQQ, so DARP leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DARP or QQQ?
DARP has been the more volatile fund at 21.4% annualized versus 17.3% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: DARP -30.3% vs QQQ -22.8%.
Should I hold both DARP and QQQ?
DARP and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DARP and QQQ?
48.3% of DARP's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 43.4% of QQQ's is in holdings DARP also owns. They hold 12 positions in common, counted across the 43 positions we hold weights for in DARP and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, DARP or QQQ?
DARP yields 0.34% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than DARP?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. DARP led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 55.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.