DECO vs QQQ
State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. DECO delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DECO | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $22M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.72% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 33 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +50.72% | +19.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +93.57% | +26.68% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +76.43% | +26.64% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +76.43% | +15.36% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 742858.0% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 9, 2024 | Mar 10, 1999 |
DECO vs QQQ Performance
State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year DECO returned +93.57% while QQQ returned +26.68%. Year to date, DECO is up 50.72% versus a gain of 19.52% for QQQ.
Over three years, DECO compounded at +76.43% per year against +26.64% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +76.43% and +15.36% respectively. Across the full 27-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.14% annualized vs +0.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DECO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 742858.0% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for DECO and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.02. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DECO charges 0.65% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $18 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DECO currently yields 0.72% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
DECO and QQQ share 8 holdings out of 125 unique holdings combined, representing a 18.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DECO or QQQ?
DECO has an expense ratio of 0.65% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $47 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DECO or QQQ?
Over the past year DECO returned +93.57% vs +26.68% for QQQ, so DECO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (27 years), DECO annualized +0.96% vs +13.14% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DECO or QQQ?
DECO has been the more volatile fund at 742858.0% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: DECO -100.0% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both DECO and QQQ?
DECO and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.02, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DECO and QQQ?
DECO and QQQ share 8 common holdings with a 18.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 125 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DECO or QQQ?
DECO yields 0.72% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so DECO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.