DECO vs IVV
State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DECO or IVV?
Option Writing against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DECO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DECO | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $20M | $886.7B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.72% | 1.10% |
| Holdings | 32 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +53.55%Best | +13.39% |
| 1Y Return | +96.12%Best | +20.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +75.18%Best | +21.29% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +75.18%Best | +12.88% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 772966.1% | 15.1%Best |
| Max Drawdown | - | -56.5% |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $164,977Best | $18,327 |
| Top 10 Weight | 63.7% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Option Writing | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 9, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jan 9, 2001 to Sep 4, 2026 (26.3 years).
DECO vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
DECO vs IVV Performance
State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO) is an ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DECO returned +96.12% while IVV returned +20.08%. Year to date, DECO is up 53.55% versus a gain of 13.39% for IVV.
Over three years, DECO compounded at +75.18% per year against +21.29% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +75.18% and +12.88% respectively. Across the full 26-year window we track, DECO has the edge at +25.02% annualized vs +7.01%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DECO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 772966.1% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.04. They move largely independently of each other.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DECO charges 0.65% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DECO currently yields 0.72% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
45.8% of DECO's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 21.5% of IVV's money is in holdings DECO also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
17 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in DECO and 505 in IVV, against full books of 32 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 480 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for DECO (77.8% of the fund), and 11 for DECO that do not appear in IVV (50.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DECO | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 5.19% | 7.98% | 2.79% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 37 | 5.69% | 5.44% | 0.25% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.53% | 1.45% | 3.08% |
| CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings Inc. Class A | 4.08% | 0.32% | 3.76% |
| PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc | 3.60% | 0.44% | 3.16% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 2.30% | 1.51% | 0.79% |
| HOODRobinhood Markets Inc - A | 3.49% | 0.11% | 3.38% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 2.07% | 0.92% | 1.15% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.06% | 0.69% | 1.37% |
| BLKBlackrock Inc | 2.34% | 0.25% | 2.09% |
45.8% of DECO is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DECO or IVV?
DECO has an expense ratio of 0.65% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $62 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DECO or IVV?
Over the past year DECO returned +96.12% vs +20.08% for IVV, so DECO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (26 years), DECO annualized +25.02% vs +7.01% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DECO or IVV?
DECO has been the more volatile fund at 772966.1% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV.
Should I hold both DECO and IVV?
DECO and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.04, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DECO and IVV?
45.8% of DECO's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 21.5% of IVV's is in holdings DECO also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 31 positions we hold weights for in DECO and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, DECO or IVV?
DECO yields 0.72% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than DECO?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DECO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 63.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.