DECO vs IVV
State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DECO delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DECO | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $22M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.72% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 33 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +50.72% | +14.29% | |
| 1Y Return | +93.57% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +76.43% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +76.43% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 742858.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -100.0% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | SPDR State Street Global Advisors | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Sep 9, 2024 | May 15, 2000 |
DECO vs IVV Performance
State Street Galaxy Digital Asset Ecosystem ETF (DECO) is a ETF from SPDR State Street Global Advisors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DECO returned +93.57% while IVV returned +21.79%. Year to date, DECO is up 50.72% versus a gain of 14.29% for IVV.
Over three years, DECO compounded at +76.43% per year against +22.19% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +76.43% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 26-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.06% annualized vs +0.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DECO has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 742858.0% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -100.0% for DECO and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.04. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DECO charges 0.65% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $3 annually, a gap of $62 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DECO currently yields 0.72% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DECO and IVV share 16 holdings out of 520 unique holdings combined, representing a 17.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DECO or IVV?
DECO has an expense ratio of 0.65% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $62 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DECO or IVV?
Over the past year DECO returned +93.57% vs +21.79% for IVV, so DECO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (26 years), DECO annualized +0.96% vs +7.06% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DECO or IVV?
DECO has been the more volatile fund at 742858.0% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DECO -100.0% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DECO and IVV?
DECO and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.04, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DECO and IVV?
DECO and IVV share 16 common holdings with a 17.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 520 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DECO or IVV?
DECO yields 0.72% while IVV yields 1.10%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.