DHLX vs IVV
Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DHLX or IVV?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DHLX | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.55% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $69M | $882.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.64% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 63 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +2.22% | +13.60%Best |
| 1Y Return | +3.66% | +16.32%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +23.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.03% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 11.8%Best | 12.7% |
| Max Drawdown | -8.4%Best | -8.9% |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $10,315 | $11,718Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 58.7% | 38.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Diamond Hill Capital Management Inc. | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 26, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 29, 2025 to Oct 2, 2026 (1 years).
DHLX vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
DHLX vs IVV Performance
Diamond Hill Large Cap Concentrated ETF (DHLX) is an ETF from Diamond Hill Capital Management Inc. and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DHLX returned +3.66% while IVV returned +16.32%. Year to date, DHLX is up 2.22% versus a gain of 13.60% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 12.7% compared with 11.8% for DHLX. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -8.4% for DHLX and -8.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.47. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DHLX charges 0.55% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $55 vs $3 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DHLX currently yields 0.64% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
88.8% of DHLX's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 20.0% of IVV's money is in holdings DHLX also owns.
Most of DHLX is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
18 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in DHLX and 505 in IVV, against full books of 63 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 479 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for DHLX (79.3% of the fund), and 1 for DHLX that do not appear in IVV (3.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DHLX | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 8.08% | 5.57% | 2.51% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 6.49% | 3.80% | 2.69% |
| BRK.BBerkshire Hathaway Inc Brk/B Us Equity | 6.88% | 1.42% | 5.46% |
| COPConocophillips Common Stock USD 0.01 | 7.60% | 0.25% | 7.35% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A | 4.37% | 3.00% | 1.37% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 5.16% | 2.15% | 3.01% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase | 4.81% | 1.44% | 3.37% |
| TMOThermo Fisherscientific Inc. | 5.25% | 0.34% | 4.91% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.22% | 0.93% | 3.29% |
| LHLabcorp Holdings Inc | 5.08% | 0.04% | 5.04% |
88.8% of DHLX is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DHLX or IVV?
DHLX has an expense ratio of 0.55% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $52 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DHLX or IVV?
Over the past year DHLX returned +3.66% vs +16.32% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), DHLX annualized +3.15% vs +17.18% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DHLX or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 12.7% annualized versus 11.8% for DHLX. Worst drawdown: DHLX -8.4% vs IVV -8.9%.
Should I hold both DHLX and IVV?
DHLX and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.47, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DHLX and IVV?
88.8% of DHLX's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 20.0% of IVV's is in holdings DHLX also owns. They hold 18 positions in common, counted across the 21 positions we hold weights for in DHLX and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, DHLX or IVV?
DHLX yields 0.64% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than DHLX?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 58.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.