DHS vs IVV
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DHS or IVV?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DHS led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DHS is less concentrated, with 34.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DHS | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.6B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.24% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 323 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +17.32%Best | +12.01% |
| 1Y Return | +21.55%Best | +16.48% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.42% | +21.21%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.37% | +12.95%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.9% | 15.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -69.7% | -56.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,916 | $18,384Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.2%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2006 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 16, 2006 to Sep 14, 2026 (20.2 years).
DHS vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 20.2 years both funds cover.
DHS vs IVV Performance
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DHS returned +21.55% while IVV returned +16.48%. Year to date, DHS is up 17.32% versus a gain of 12.01% for IVV.
Over three years, DHS compounded at +17.42% per year against +21.21% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +12.37% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.75% annualized vs +5.36%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DHS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.9% compared with 15.3% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -69.7% for DHS and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DHS charges 0.38% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $3 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DHS currently yields 3.24% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
78.7% of DHS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 9.7% of IVV's money is in holdings DHS also owns.
Most of DHS is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
73 positions in common, counted across the 315 positions we hold weights for in DHS and 490 in IVV, against full books of 323 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 409 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for DHS (88.9% of the fund), and 231 for DHS that do not appear in IVV (19.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DHS | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 4.94% | 0.68% | 4.26% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 4.84% | 0.55% | 4.29% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 3.66% | 1.01% | 2.65% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 3.53% | 0.17% | 3.36% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 3.16% | 0.44% | 2.72% |
| TBBAt&t Inc | 3.13% | 0.27% | 2.86% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 2.72% | 0.58% | 2.14% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 2.82% | 0.36% | 2.46% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 2.79% | 0.32% | 2.47% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 2.62% | 0.21% | 2.41% |
78.7% of DHS is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DHS or IVV?
DHS has an expense ratio of 0.38% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DHS or IVV?
Over the past year DHS returned +21.55% vs +16.48% for IVV, so DHS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), DHS annualized +5.36% vs +9.75% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DHS or IVV?
DHS has been the more volatile fund at 15.9% annualized versus 15.3% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DHS -69.7% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DHS and IVV?
DHS and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DHS and IVV?
78.7% of DHS's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 9.7% of IVV's is in holdings DHS also owns. They hold 73 positions in common, counted across the 315 positions we hold weights for in DHS and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, DHS or IVV?
DHS yields 3.24% while IVV yields 1.06%, so DHS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than DHS?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. DHS led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. DHS is less concentrated, with 34.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.