DHS vs VTI
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, DHS or VTI?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. DHS led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.2%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DHS | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.38% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.6B | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.24% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 323 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +14.97%Best | +12.30% |
| 1Y Return | +18.62%Best | +16.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.79% | +21.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +12.26% | +12.36%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.0% | 15.7%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -69.7% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $17,829 | $17,908Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 34.2% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | WisdomTree Investments | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Jun 16, 2006 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 16, 2006 to Sep 18, 2026 (20.3 years).
DHS vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 20.3 years both funds cover.
DHS vs VTI Performance
WisdomTree US High Dividend Fund (DHS) is an ETF from WisdomTree Investments and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DHS returned +18.62% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, DHS is up 14.97% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Over three years, DHS compounded at +16.79% per year against +21.01% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +12.26% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.70% annualized vs +5.25%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DHS has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.0% compared with 15.7% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -69.7% for DHS and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.81. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DHS charges 0.38% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $38 vs $3 annually, a gap of $35 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DHS currently yields 3.24% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
98.7% of DHS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 9.4% of VTI's money is in holdings DHS also owns.
Most of DHS is already inside VTI. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
308 positions in common, counted across the 315 positions we hold weights for in DHS and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 323 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,008 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for DHS (88.0% of the fund), and 4 for DHS that do not appear in VTI (0.1%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DHS | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABBVAbbvie Inc. | 4.94% | 0.61% | 4.33% |
| MRKMerck & Company Inc | 4.84% | 0.45% | 4.39% |
| XOMExxon Mobil Corp. | 3.66% | 0.89% | 2.77% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 3.53% | 0.16% | 3.37% |
| PMPhilip Morris International Inc. | 3.16% | 0.41% | 2.75% |
| TBBAt&t Inc | 3.13% | 0.22% | 2.91% |
| CVXChevron Corp | 2.72% | 0.52% | 2.20% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 2.82% | 0.35% | 2.47% |
| VZVerizon Communic | 2.79% | 0.24% | 2.55% |
| BMYBristol-Myers Squibb Co. | 2.62% | 0.18% | 2.44% |
98.7% of DHS is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DHS or VTI?
DHS has an expense ratio of 0.38% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $35 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DHS or VTI?
Over the past year DHS returned +18.62% vs +16.08% for VTI, so DHS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), DHS annualized +5.25% vs +9.70% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DHS or VTI?
DHS has been the more volatile fund at 16.0% annualized versus 15.7% for VTI. Worst drawdown: DHS -69.7% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both DHS and VTI?
DHS and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.81, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DHS and VTI?
98.7% of DHS's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 9.4% of VTI's is in holdings DHS also owns. They hold 308 positions in common, counted across the 315 positions we hold weights for in DHS and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, DHS or VTI?
DHS yields 3.24% while VTI yields 1.03%, so DHS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than DHS?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. DHS led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 34.2%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.