DOGG vs IVV
FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DOGG | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $85M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.58% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 42 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +11.56% | +12.71% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.76% | +21.89% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.19% | +22.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.96% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.5% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 26, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
DOGG vs IVV Performance
FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DOGG returned +17.76% while IVV returned +21.89%. Year to date, DOGG is up 11.56% versus a gain of 12.71% for IVV.
Over three years, DOGG compounded at +4.19% per year against +22.08% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.00% annualized vs +3.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DOGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.4% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.5% for DOGG and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.21. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DOGG charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DOGG currently yields 8.58% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
DOGG and IVV share 10 holdings out of 505 unique holdings combined, representing a 4.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DOGG or IVV?
DOGG has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DOGG or IVV?
Over the past year DOGG returned +17.76% vs +21.89% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), DOGG annualized +3.32% vs +7.00% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DOGG or IVV?
DOGG has been the more volatile fund at 16.4% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DOGG -22.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both DOGG and IVV?
DOGG and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.21, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DOGG and IVV?
DOGG and IVV share 10 common holdings with a 4.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 505 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DOGG or IVV?
DOGG yields 8.58% while IVV yields 1.10%, so DOGG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.