DOGG vs VTI
FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DOGG | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $85M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 8.58% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 42 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +11.56% | +13.14% | |
| 1Y Return | +17.76% | +22.35% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +4.19% | +21.83% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.01% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.4% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -22.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | First Trust Portfolios (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity | |
| Inception | Apr 26, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
DOGG vs VTI Performance
FT Vest DJIA Dogs 10 Target Income ETF (DOGG) is a ETF from First Trust Portfolios (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year DOGG returned +17.76% while VTI returned +22.35%. Year to date, DOGG is up 11.56% versus a gain of 13.14% for VTI.
Over three years, DOGG compounded at +4.19% per year against +21.83% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.09% annualized vs +3.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DOGG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.4% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -22.5% for DOGG and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.23. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DOGG charges 0.75% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DOGG currently yields 8.58% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
DOGG and VTI share 10 holdings out of 2787 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DOGG or VTI?
DOGG has an expense ratio of 0.75% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $72 per year of difference.
Which performed better, DOGG or VTI?
Over the past year DOGG returned +17.76% vs +22.35% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), DOGG annualized +3.32% vs +8.09% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, DOGG or VTI?
DOGG has been the more volatile fund at 16.4% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: DOGG -22.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both DOGG and VTI?
DOGG and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.23, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between DOGG and VTI?
DOGG and VTI share 10 common holdings with a 3.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2787 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, DOGG or VTI?
DOGG yields 8.58% while VTI yields 1.07%, so DOGG currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.