DUHP vs IVV
Dimensional US High Profitability ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DUHP or IVV?
Nearly the same fund. IVV costs less.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DUHP | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.20% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $19.1B | $882.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.90% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 160 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +11.68% | +13.60%Best |
| 1Y Return | +11.87% | +16.32%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.91% | +23.81%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.03% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 15.1%Best | 15.5% |
| Max Drawdown | -20.1%Best | -22.1% |
| $10,000 over 4.6 years | $17,927 | $19,196Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 43.0% | 38.1%Best |
| Fund Family | Dimensional | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Feb 23, 2022 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.6 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Feb 24, 2022 to Oct 2, 2026 (4.6 years).
DUHP vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.6 years both funds cover.
DUHP vs IVV Performance
Dimensional US High Profitability ETF (DUHP) is an ETF from Dimensional and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DUHP returned +11.87% while IVV returned +16.32%. Year to date, DUHP is up 11.68% versus a gain of 13.60% for IVV.
Over three years, DUHP compounded at +19.91% per year against +23.81% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
IVV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.5% compared with 15.1% for DUHP. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -20.1% for DUHP and -22.1% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.96. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DUHP charges 0.20% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $20 vs $3 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DUHP currently yields 0.90% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
97.2% of DUHP's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 49.1% of IVV's money is in holdings DUHP also owns.
Most of DUHP is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
137 positions in common, counted across the 158 positions we hold weights for in DUHP and 505 in IVV, against full books of 160 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 360 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for DUHP (50.2% of the fund), and 16 for DUHP that do not appear in IVV (2.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DUHP | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp | 7.73% | 8.00% | 0.27% |
| AAPLApple, Inc | 7.38% | 7.39% | 0.01% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 4.99% | 5.57% | 0.58% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 3.68% | 2.15% | 1.53% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 4.34% | 1.34% | 3.00% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.78% | 1.66% | 2.12% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.23% | 0.93% | 3.30% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 2.37% | 0.70% | 1.67% |
| CATCaterpillar, Inc. | 2.33% | 0.57% | 1.76% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 2.14% | 0.56% | 1.58% |
97.2% of DUHP is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DUHP or IVV?
DUHP has an expense ratio of 0.20% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $17 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DUHP or IVV?
Over the past year DUHP returned +11.87% vs +16.32% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DUHP or IVV?
IVV has been the more volatile fund at 15.5% annualized versus 15.1% for DUHP. Worst drawdown: DUHP -20.1% vs IVV -22.1%.
Should I hold both DUHP and IVV?
DUHP and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.96, so they move almost identically. What is left to separate them is the fee and the index each one tracks. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DUHP and IVV?
97.2% of DUHP's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 49.1% of IVV's is in holdings DUHP also owns. They hold 137 positions in common, counted across the 158 positions we hold weights for in DUHP and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, DUHP or IVV?
DUHP yields 0.90% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than DUHP?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y and the full window. The two have moved almost in lockstep, correlation 0.96. IVV is less concentrated, with 38.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 43.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.