DUNK vs IVV
Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, DUNK or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 69.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DUNK | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.75% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $170M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 25 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +13.56%Best | +12.39% |
| 1Y Return | +9.01% | +16.61%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +21.38% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 26.5% | 13.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.6% | -8.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 1 years | $11,000 | $11,695Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 69.0% | 37.8%Best |
| Fund Family | Dana Investment Advisors | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 15, 2025 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 1 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 16, 2025 to Sep 18, 2026 (1 years).
DUNK vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 1 years both funds cover.
DUNK vs IVV Performance
Dana Unconstrained Equity ETF (DUNK) is an ETF from Dana Investment Advisors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year DUNK returned +9.01% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, DUNK is up 13.56% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
DUNK has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 26.5% compared with 13.3% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.6% for DUNK and -8.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.71. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DUNK charges 0.75% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $75 vs $3 annually, a gap of $72 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DUNK currently yields 0.00% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
80.3% of DUNK's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 33.3% of IVV's money is in holdings DUNK also owns.
Most of DUNK is already inside IVV. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.
21 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in DUNK and 490 in IVV, against full books of 25 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 461 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for DUNK (65.3% of the fund), and 4 for DUNK that do not appear in IVV (12.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DUNK | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 9.03% | 5.69% | 3.34% |
| NVDANvidia Corp | 5.98% | 8.07% | 2.09% |
| NOWServicenow, Inc | 10.63% | 0.23% | 10.40% |
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 4.25% | 3.84% | 0.41% |
| DASHDoordash Inc - A | 6.26% | 0.13% | 6.13% |
| JNJJohnson & Johnson - Common | 4.88% | 0.97% | 3.91% |
| VVisa Inc Class A | 4.89% | 0.95% | 3.94% |
| LLYEli Lilly & Co. | 4.30% | 1.38% | 2.92% |
| MAMastercard Inc | 4.76% | 0.72% | 4.04% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 2.47% | 2.65% | 0.18% |
80.3% of DUNK is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DUNK or IVV?
DUNK has an expense ratio of 0.75% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $72 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, DUNK or IVV?
Over the past year DUNK returned +9.01% vs +16.61% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (1 years), DUNK annualized +10.00% vs +16.95% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, DUNK or IVV?
DUNK has been the more volatile fund at 26.5% annualized versus 13.3% for IVV. Worst drawdown: DUNK -25.6% vs IVV -8.9%.
Should I hold both DUNK and IVV?
DUNK and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.71, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between DUNK and IVV?
80.3% of DUNK's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 33.3% of IVV's is in holdings DUNK also owns. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 26 positions we hold weights for in DUNK and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, DUNK or IVV?
DUNK yields 0.00% while IVV yields 1.06%, so IVV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than DUNK?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y and the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 69.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.