DVGR vs QQQ
DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, DVGR or QQQ?
QQQ costs less.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. DVGR is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | DVGR | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.65% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $17M | $483.5B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.60% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 38 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +4.43% | +17.95%Best |
| 1Y Return | - | +21.77% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +25.63% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.24% |
| Top 10 Weight | 41.8%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | Dividend Assets Capital, LLC | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 4, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
DVGR vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
DVGR vs QQQ Performance
DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF (DVGR) is an ETF from Dividend Assets Capital, LLC and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, DVGR is up 4.43% versus a gain of 17.95% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
DVGR charges 0.65% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $18 annually, a gap of $47 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DVGR currently yields 0.60% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
30.2% of DVGR's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 14.9% of QQQ's money is in holdings DVGR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
9 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in DVGR and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 38 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 87 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for DVGR (82.7% of the fund), and 25 for DVGR that do not appear in QQQ (60.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in DVGR | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.28% | 5.76% | 0.48% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 4.47% | 3.16% | 1.31% |
| COSTCostco Wholesale Corp. | 4.07% | 1.84% | 2.23% |
| AMGNAmgen Inc. | 3.22% | 0.97% | 2.25% |
| TXNTexas Instrument Inc | 2.83% | 1.12% | 1.71% |
| KLACKla Corp | 2.75% | 1.11% | 1.64% |
| CTASCintas Corp. | 3.07% | 0.35% | 2.72% |
| INTUIntuit, Inc. | 2.26% | 0.39% | 1.87% |
| PAYXPaychex, Inc. | 2.21% | 0.19% | 2.02% |
30.2% of DVGR is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, DVGR or QQQ?
DVGR has an expense ratio of 0.65% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $47 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between DVGR and QQQ?
30.2% of DVGR's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 14.9% of QQQ's is in holdings DVGR also owns. They hold 9 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in DVGR and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, DVGR or QQQ?
DVGR yields 0.60% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so DVGR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than DVGR?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. DVGR is less concentrated, with 41.8% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.