DVGR vs VYM

DVGR vs VYM

Which is better, DVGR or VYM?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Value.

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%.

Lower Fees: VYMLess Concentrated: VYM

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricDVGRVYM
Expense Ratio0.65%0.04%Best
AUM$17M$81.6B
Dividend Yield0.60%2.22%
Holdings38613
YTD Return+4.50%+12.29%Best
1Y Return-+16.61%
3Y Return (annualized)-+17.42%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.12%
Top 10 Weight41.8%26.1%Best
Fund FamilyDividend Assets Capital, LLCVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Value
InceptionDec 4, 2025Nov 10, 2006

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

DVGR vs VYM growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

DVGR vs VYM Performance

DAC 3D Dividend Growth ETF (DVGR) is an ETF from Dividend Assets Capital, LLC and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, DVGR is up 4.50% versus a gain of 12.29% for VYM.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

DVGR charges 0.65% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $65 vs $4 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, DVGR currently yields 0.60% against 2.22% for VYM.

Holdings Overlap

DVGR already in VYM47.9%
VYM already in DVGR18.7%

47.9% of DVGR's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 18.7% of VYM's money is in holdings DVGR also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

17 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in DVGR and 557 in VYM, against full books of 38 and 613.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 511 positions for VYM that do not appear in our book for DVGR (78.4% of the fund), and 17 for DVGR that do not appear in VYM (42.6%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in DVGRWeight in VYMDifference
AVGOBroadcom Inc4.47%7.35%2.88%
JPMJpmorgan Chase4.01%3.82%0.19%
ORCLOracle Corp - Common5.25%0.90%4.35%
UNHUnitedhealth Group Incorporated3.81%1.52%2.29%
GSGoldman Sachs Group Inc/The3.88%1.13%2.75%
NEENextera Energy Inc3.90%0.74%3.16%
AMGNAmgen Inc.3.22%0.78%2.44%
TXNTexas Instrument Inc2.83%1.02%1.81%
WSMWilliams-sonoma Inc2.31%0.11%2.20%
PAYXPaychex, Inc.2.21%0.15%2.06%

47.9% of DVGR is already inside VYM.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

DVGRVYM

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, DVGR or VYM?

DVGR has an expense ratio of 0.65% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option, by $61 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between DVGR and VYM?

47.9% of DVGR's money is in holdings VYM also owns. 18.7% of VYM's is in holdings DVGR also owns. They hold 17 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in DVGR and 557 in VYM.

Which pays a higher dividend, DVGR or VYM?

DVGR yields 0.60% while VYM yields 2.22%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VYM better than DVGR?

VYM has a lower expense ratio. VYM is less concentrated, with 26.1% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 41.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.