ECML vs QQQ
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. ECML delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ECML | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $130M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.19% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 64 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +21.49% | +17.46% | |
| 1Y Return | +32.82% | +26.02% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.00% | +25.51% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.12% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.7% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Euclidean Technologies | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 18, 2023 | Mar 10, 1999 |
ECML vs QQQ Performance
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) is a ETF from Euclidean Technologies and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year ECML returned +32.82% while QQQ returned +26.02%. Year to date, ECML is up 21.49% versus a gain of 17.46% for QQQ.
Over three years, ECML compounded at +13.00% per year against +25.51% for QQQ. Across the full 3-year window we track, ECML has the edge at +16.91% annualized vs +13.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 18.7% for ECML. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for ECML and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.33. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ECML charges 0.95% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $18 annually, a gap of $77 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ECML currently yields 1.19% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
ECML and QQQ share 1 holdings out of 165 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ECML | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| ADBE | 1.76% | 0.41% | 1.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ECML or QQQ?
ECML has an expense ratio of 0.95% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $77 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ECML or QQQ?
Over the past year ECML returned +32.82% vs +26.02% for QQQ, so ECML leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), ECML annualized +16.91% vs +13.08% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ECML or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 18.7% for ECML. Worst drawdown: ECML -25.4% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both ECML and QQQ?
ECML and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.33, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ECML and QQQ?
ECML and QQQ share 1 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 165 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ECML or QQQ?
ECML yields 1.19% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so ECML currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.