ECML vs VTI
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ECML delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ECML | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $130M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.19% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 64 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +21.79% | +14.16% | |
| 1Y Return | +33.15% | +23.62% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +13.24% | +21.43% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.33% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Euclidean Technologies | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 18, 2023 | May 24, 2001 |
ECML vs VTI Performance
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) is a ETF from Euclidean Technologies and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ECML returned +33.15% while VTI returned +23.62%. Year to date, ECML is up 21.79% versus a gain of 14.16% for VTI.
Over three years, ECML compounded at +13.24% per year against +21.43% for VTI. Across the full 3-year window we track, ECML has the edge at +17.02% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ECML has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for ECML and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ECML charges 0.95% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ECML currently yields 1.19% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ECML and VTI share 51 holdings out of 2795 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ECML or VTI?
ECML has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ECML or VTI?
Over the past year ECML returned +33.15% vs +23.62% for VTI, so ECML leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), ECML annualized +17.02% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ECML or VTI?
ECML has been the more volatile fund at 18.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ECML -25.4% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ECML and VTI?
ECML and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ECML and VTI?
ECML and VTI share 51 common holdings with a 1.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2795 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ECML or VTI?
ECML yields 1.19% while VTI yields 1.07%, so ECML currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.