ECML vs IVV
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ECML delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ECML | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $130M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.15% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 64 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +24.33% | +13.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.38% | +19.95% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.52% | +21.26% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.82% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.8% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | Euclidean Technologies | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 18, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
ECML vs IVV Performance
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) is a ETF from Euclidean Technologies and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ECML returned +27.38% while IVV returned +19.95%. Year to date, ECML is up 24.33% versus a gain of 13.25% for IVV.
Over three years, ECML compounded at +14.52% per year against +21.26% for IVV. Across the full 3-year window we track, ECML has the edge at +17.48% annualized vs +7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ECML has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for ECML and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ECML charges 0.95% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ECML currently yields 1.15% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ECML and IVV share 20 holdings out of 547 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ECML or IVV?
ECML has an expense ratio of 0.95% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ECML or IVV?
Over the past year ECML returned +27.38% vs +19.95% for IVV, so ECML leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), ECML annualized +17.48% vs +7.01% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ECML or IVV?
ECML has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ECML -25.4% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ECML and IVV?
ECML and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ECML and IVV?
ECML and IVV share 20 common holdings with a 1.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 547 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ECML or IVV?
ECML yields 1.15% while IVV yields 1.10%, so ECML currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.