ECML vs IVV
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ECML or IVV?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ECML led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y and the full window. ECML is less concentrated, with 22.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ECML | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $130M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 63 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +20.99%Best | +12.39% |
| 1Y Return | +22.93%Best | +16.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.29% | +21.38%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.51% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 12.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | -18.8%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.3 years | $16,413 | $18,892Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.6%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | Euclidean Technologies | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 18, 2023 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 18, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3.3 years).
ECML vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.3 years both funds cover.
ECML vs IVV Performance
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) is an ETF from Euclidean Technologies and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ECML returned +22.93% while IVV returned +16.61%. Year to date, ECML is up 20.99% versus a gain of 12.39% for IVV.
Over three years, ECML compounded at +14.29% per year against +21.38% for IVV.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ECML has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 12.8% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for ECML and -18.8% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ECML charges 0.95% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ECML currently yields 1.10% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
31.1% of ECML's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 2.0% of IVV's money is in holdings ECML also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
19 positions in common, counted across the 63 positions we hold weights for in ECML and 490 in IVV, against full books of 63 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 463 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ECML (96.7% of the fund), and 43 for ECML that do not appear in IVV (67.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ECML | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FCXFreeport-mcmoran Copper & Gold Inc. | 2.35% | 0.16% | 2.19% |
| VLOValero Energy | 2.22% | 0.16% | 2.06% |
| ADBEAdobe Systems | 2.19% | 0.18% | 2.01% |
| APAApa Corp | 2.17% | 0.02% | 2.15% |
| FOXAFox Corp. Class A | 2.15% | 0.02% | 2.13% |
| CFCf Industries Holdings Inc. | 2.11% | 0.03% | 2.08% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 1.83% | 0.17% | 1.66% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 1.69% | 0.20% | 1.49% |
| DALDl Co., Ltd. | 1.68% | 0.08% | 1.60% |
| ELVElevance Health Inc | 1.55% | 0.13% | 1.42% |
31.1% of ECML is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ECML or IVV?
ECML has an expense ratio of 0.95% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ECML or IVV?
Over the past year ECML returned +22.93% vs +16.61% for IVV, so ECML leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ECML or IVV?
ECML has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 12.8% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ECML -25.4% vs IVV -18.8%.
Should I hold both ECML and IVV?
ECML and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ECML and IVV?
31.1% of ECML's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 2.0% of IVV's is in holdings ECML also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 63 positions we hold weights for in ECML and 490 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ECML or IVV?
ECML yields 1.10% while IVV yields 1.06%, so ECML currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ECML?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ECML led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y and the full window. ECML is less concentrated, with 22.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.