ECML vs VOO
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ECML or VOO?
Large Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ECML led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y and the full window. ECML is less concentrated, with 22.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ECML | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $130M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.10% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 63 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +20.99%Best | +12.37% |
| 1Y Return | +22.93%Best | +16.61% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.29% | +21.37%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.49% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.6% | 12.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | -18.7%Best |
| $10,000 over 3.3 years | $16,413 | $18,886Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 22.6%Best | 37.6% |
| Fund Family | Euclidean Technologies | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | May 18, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 3.3 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: May 18, 2023 to Sep 18, 2026 (3.3 years).
ECML vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 3.3 years both funds cover.
ECML vs VOO Performance
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) is an ETF from Euclidean Technologies and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ECML returned +22.93% while VOO returned +16.61%. Year to date, ECML is up 20.99% versus a gain of 12.37% for VOO.
Over three years, ECML compounded at +14.29% per year against +21.37% for VOO.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ECML has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.6% compared with 12.8% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for ECML and -18.7% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ECML charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ECML currently yields 1.10% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
31.1% of ECML's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.9% of VOO's money is in holdings ECML also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
19 positions in common, counted across the 63 positions we hold weights for in ECML and 494 in VOO, against full books of 63 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 468 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for ECML (97.3% of the fund), and 43 for ECML that do not appear in VOO (67.2%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ECML | Weight in VOO | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| FCXFreeport-mcmoran Copper & Gold Inc. | 2.35% | 0.14% | 2.21% |
| VLOValero Energy | 2.22% | 0.14% | 2.08% |
| ADBEAdobe Systems | 2.19% | 0.16% | 2.03% |
| APAApa Corp | 2.17% | 0.02% | 2.15% |
| FOXAFox Corp. Class A | 2.15% | 0.02% | 2.13% |
| CFCf Industries Holdings Inc. | 2.11% | 0.03% | 2.08% |
| MOAltria Group Inc | 1.83% | 0.18% | 1.65% |
| NEMNewmont Corp Common | 1.69% | 0.16% | 1.53% |
| DALDl Co., Ltd. | 1.68% | 0.09% | 1.59% |
| ELVElevance Health Inc | 1.55% | 0.13% | 1.42% |
31.1% of ECML is already inside VOO.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ECML or VOO?
ECML has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $92 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ECML or VOO?
Over the past year ECML returned +22.93% vs +16.61% for VOO, so ECML leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ECML or VOO?
ECML has been the more volatile fund at 18.6% annualized versus 12.8% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ECML -25.4% vs VOO -18.7%.
Should I hold both ECML and VOO?
ECML and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ECML and VOO?
31.1% of ECML's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 1.9% of VOO's is in holdings ECML also owns. They hold 19 positions in common, counted across the 63 positions we hold weights for in ECML and 494 in VOO.
Which pays a higher dividend, ECML or VOO?
ECML yields 1.10% while VOO yields 1.04%, so ECML currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than ECML?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ECML led over 1Y, VOO over 3Y and the full window. ECML is less concentrated, with 22.6% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.