ECML vs VOO
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. ECML delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ECML | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $130M | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.15% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 64 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +24.33% | +13.25% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.38% | +19.96% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.52% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.81% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.8% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Euclidean Technologies | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 18, 2023 | Sep 7, 2010 |
ECML vs VOO Performance
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) is a ETF from Euclidean Technologies and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ECML returned +27.38% while VOO returned +19.96%. Year to date, ECML is up 24.33% versus a gain of 13.25% for VOO.
Over three years, ECML compounded at +14.52% per year against +21.27% for VOO. Across the full 3-year window we track, ECML has the edge at +17.48% annualized vs +13.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ECML has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for ECML and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.58. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ECML charges 0.95% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $3 annually, a gap of $92 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ECML currently yields 1.15% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
ECML and VOO share 20 holdings out of 547 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ECML or VOO?
ECML has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $92 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ECML or VOO?
Over the past year ECML returned +27.38% vs +19.96% for VOO, so ECML leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), ECML annualized +17.48% vs +13.49% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ECML or VOO?
ECML has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ECML -25.4% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both ECML and VOO?
ECML and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.58, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ECML and VOO?
ECML and VOO share 20 common holdings with a 1.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 547 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ECML or VOO?
ECML yields 1.15% while VOO yields 1.08%, so ECML currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.