ECML vs VYM
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. ECML delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 616 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ECML | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.95% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $130M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.15% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 64 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +24.33% | +14.84% | |
| 1Y Return | +27.38% | +20.88% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +14.52% | +18.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.04% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 18.8% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -25.4% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Euclidean Technologies | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | May 18, 2023 | Nov 10, 2006 |
ECML vs VYM Performance
Euclidean Fundamental Value ETF (ECML) is a ETF from Euclidean Technologies and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ECML returned +27.38% while VYM returned +20.88%. Year to date, ECML is up 24.33% versus a gain of 14.84% for VYM.
Over three years, ECML compounded at +14.52% per year against +18.34% for VYM. Across the full 3-year window we track, ECML has the edge at +17.48% annualized vs +7.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ECML has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 18.8% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -25.4% for ECML and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ECML charges 0.95% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $95 vs $4 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ECML currently yields 1.15% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
ECML and VYM share 24 holdings out of 641 unique holdings combined, representing a 3.6% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ECML or VYM?
ECML has an expense ratio of 0.95% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $91 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ECML or VYM?
Over the past year ECML returned +27.38% vs +20.88% for VYM, so ECML leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (3 years), ECML annualized +17.48% vs +7.01% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ECML or VYM?
ECML has been the more volatile fund at 18.8% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: ECML -25.4% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both ECML and VYM?
ECML and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ECML and VYM?
ECML and VYM share 24 common holdings with a 3.6% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 641 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ECML or VYM?
ECML yields 1.15% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.