EDV vs VT
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF vs Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
EDV has a lower expense ratio. VT delivered stronger 1-year returns. VT offers more diversification with 10,133 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EDV | VT | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.05% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $3.4B | $78.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 5.42% | 1.60% | |
| Holdings | 163 | 10,133 | |
| YTD Return | -4.05% | +13.98% | |
| 1Y Return | -2.50% | +21.80% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -4.48% | +20.40% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -12.62% | +10.83% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 21.9% | 16.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -62.0% | -50.6% | |
| Fund Family | Vanguard (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Fixed Income | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 6, 2007 | Jun 24, 2008 |
EDV vs VT Performance
Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) is a ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EDV returned -2.50% while VT returned +21.80%. Year to date, EDV is down 4.05% versus a gain of 13.98% for VT.
Over three years, EDV compounded at -4.48% per year against +20.40% for VT; over five years the annualized figures are -12.62% and +10.83% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, VT has the edge at +7.33% annualized vs -1.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 21.9% compared with 16.6% for VT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.0% for EDV and -50.6% for VT. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.08. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EDV charges 0.05% per year while VT charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $6 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDV currently yields 5.42% against 1.60% for VT.
Holdings Overlap
EDV and VT share 0 holdings out of 9004 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EDV or VT?
EDV has an expense ratio of 0.05% while VT charges 0.06%. EDV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $1 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EDV or VT?
Over the past year EDV returned -2.50% vs +21.80% for VT, so VT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), EDV annualized -1.39% vs +7.33% for VT. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EDV or VT?
EDV has been the more volatile fund at 21.9% annualized versus 16.6% for VT. Worst drawdown: EDV -62.0% vs VT -50.6%.
Should I hold both EDV and VT?
EDV and VT have a monthly-return correlation of -0.08, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EDV and VT?
EDV and VT share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 9004 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EDV or VT?
EDV yields 5.42% while VT yields 1.60%, so EDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.