EDV vs VT

EDV vs VT

Which is better, EDV or VT?

Long Term Government Bond against Large Cap Blend.

EDV has a lower expense ratio. VT led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.

Lower Fees: EDVHigher Returns: VT

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEDVVT
Expense Ratio0.05%Best0.06%
AUM$3.8B$97.9B
Dividend Yield5.42%1.55%
Holdings8310,133
YTD Return-5.68%+12.24%Best
1Y Return-8.12%+17.11%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-3.49%+20.23%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-13.17%+11.20%Best
Volatility (annualized)22.0%16.6%Best
Max Drawdown-62.0%-50.6%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$4,936$17,003Best
Fund FamilyVanguard (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryFixed IncomeEquity
StyleLong Term Government BondLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 6, 2007Jun 24, 2008

Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Jun 26, 2008 to Sep 18, 2026 (18.2 years).

EDV vs VT growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 18.2 years both funds cover.

EDV vs VT Performance

Vanguard Extended Duration Treasury ETF (EDV) is an ETF from Vanguard (US) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EDV returned -8.12% while VT returned +17.11%. Year to date, EDV is down 5.68% versus a gain of 12.24% for VT.

Over three years, EDV compounded at -3.49% per year against +20.23% for VT; over five years the annualized figures are -13.17% and +11.20% respectively. Across the full 18-year window we track, VT has the edge at +7.22% annualized vs -1.44%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

EDV has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.0% compared with 16.6% for VT. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -62.0% for EDV and -50.6% for VT. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at -0.08. They move largely independently of each other.

Fees and Cost Over Time

EDV charges 0.05% per year while VT charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $5 vs $6 annually, a gap of $1 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EDV currently yields 5.42% against 1.55% for VT.

You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.

Whichever of EDV and VT you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.

EDVVT

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EDV or VT?

EDV has an expense ratio of 0.05% while VT charges 0.06%. EDV is the cheaper option, by $1 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, EDV or VT?

Over the past year EDV returned -8.12% vs +17.11% for VT, so VT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (18 years), EDV annualized -1.44% vs +7.22% for VT. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, EDV or VT?

EDV has been the more volatile fund at 22.0% annualized versus 16.6% for VT. Worst drawdown: EDV -62.0% vs VT -50.6%.

Should I hold both EDV and VT?

EDV and VT have a monthly-return correlation of -0.08, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which pays a higher dividend, EDV or VT?

EDV yields 5.42% while VT yields 1.55%, so EDV currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VT better than EDV?

EDV has a lower expense ratio. VT led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.