EMCR vs IVV
Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EMCR or IVV?
Each has led over a different period.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EMCR led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window. EMCR is less concentrated, with 30.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMCR | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $62M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.46% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 1,373 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +13.32%Best | +11.03% |
| 1Y Return | +20.09%Best | +15.62% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +21.10%Best | +20.81% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +7.92% | +12.61%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 16.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,639 | $18,109Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 30.5%Best | 37.8% |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 4, 2018 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 6, 2018 to Sep 16, 2026 (7.8 years).
EMCR vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.8 years both funds cover.
EMCR vs IVV Performance
Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EMCR returned +20.09% while IVV returned +15.62%. Year to date, EMCR is up 13.32% versus a gain of 11.03% for IVV.
Over three years, EMCR compounded at +21.10% per year against +20.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +7.92% and +12.61% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +15.22% annualized vs +9.87%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMCR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 16.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for EMCR and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.75. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMCR charges 0.15% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMCR currently yields 1.46% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
0.1% of IVV's money is in holdings EMCR also owns.
We cannot see either book well enough to say how much of this pair is duplicated.
1 positions in common, counted across the 1,498 positions we hold weights for in EMCR and 490 in IVV, against full books of 1,373 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 481 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for EMCR (98.5% of the fund), and 13 for EMCR that do not appear in IVV (0.7%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EMCR | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| TELTE Connectivity PLC Common Stock | 0.02% | 0.09% | 0.07% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EMCR and IVV you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMCR or IVV?
EMCR has an expense ratio of 0.15% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EMCR or IVV?
Over the past year EMCR returned +20.09% vs +15.62% for IVV, so EMCR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), EMCR annualized +9.87% vs +15.22% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EMCR or IVV?
EMCR has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 16.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EMCR -34.3% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both EMCR and IVV?
EMCR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.75, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMCR or IVV?
EMCR yields 1.46% while IVV yields 1.06%, so EMCR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than EMCR?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EMCR led over 1Y and 3Y, IVV over 5Y and the full window. EMCR is less concentrated, with 30.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.8%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.