EMCR vs VXUS
Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. EMCR delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMCR | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $61M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.59% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 1,381 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +15.86% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.46% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.18% | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.72% | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 4, 2018 | Jan 26, 2011 |
EMCR vs VXUS Performance
Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMCR returned +31.46% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, EMCR is up 15.86% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Over three years, EMCR compounded at +22.18% per year against +20.34% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +8.72% and +9.38% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, EMCR has the edge at +10.31% annualized vs +4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMCR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for EMCR and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMCR charges 0.15% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $5 annually, a gap of $10 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMCR currently yields 1.59% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
EMCR and VXUS share 989 holdings out of 8230 unique holdings combined, representing a 17.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMCR or VXUS?
EMCR has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $10 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMCR or VXUS?
Over the past year EMCR returned +31.46% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so EMCR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), EMCR annualized +10.31% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMCR or VXUS?
EMCR has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: EMCR -34.3% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both EMCR and VXUS?
EMCR and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between EMCR and VXUS?
EMCR and VXUS share 989 common holdings with a 17.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8230 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMCR or VXUS?
EMCR yields 1.59% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.