EMCR vs QQQ
Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
EMCR has a lower expense ratio. EMCR delivered stronger 1-year returns. EMCR offers more diversification with 1,381 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMCR | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $61M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.59% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 1,381 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +16.01% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.82% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.61% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.95% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 4, 2018 | Mar 10, 1999 |
EMCR vs QQQ Performance
Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EMCR returned +31.82% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, EMCR is up 16.01% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, EMCR compounded at +22.61% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +8.95% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +10.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 17.0% for EMCR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for EMCR and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.70. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMCR charges 0.15% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $18 annually, a gap of $3 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMCR currently yields 1.59% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
EMCR and QQQ share 2 holdings out of 1450 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMCR or QQQ?
EMCR has an expense ratio of 0.15% while QQQ charges 0.18%. EMCR is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $3 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMCR or QQQ?
Over the past year EMCR returned +31.82% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so EMCR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), EMCR annualized +10.30% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMCR or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 17.0% for EMCR. Worst drawdown: EMCR -34.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both EMCR and QQQ?
EMCR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.70, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMCR and QQQ?
EMCR and QQQ share 2 common holdings with a 0.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1450 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMCR or QQQ?
EMCR yields 1.59% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so EMCR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.