EMCR vs VOO
Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EMCR or VOO?
Each has led over a different period.
VOO has a lower expense ratio. EMCR led over 1Y and 3Y, VOO over 5Y and the full window. EMCR is less concentrated, with 33.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMCR | VOO |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $62M | $997.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.46% | 1.04% |
| Holdings | 1,373 | 509 |
| YTD Return | +17.48%Best | +12.23% |
| 1Y Return | +29.23%Best | +18.60% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.44%Best | +20.98% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.26% | +12.76%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 16.9% | 16.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3%Tie | -34.3%Tie |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,871 | $18,230Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 33.4%Best | 36.4% |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Dec 4, 2018 | Sep 7, 2010 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Dec 6, 2018 to Sep 9, 2026 (7.8 years).
EMCR vs VOO growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 7.8 years both funds cover.
EMCR vs VOO Performance
Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) is an ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMCR returned +29.23% while VOO returned +18.60%. Year to date, EMCR is up 17.48% versus a gain of 12.23% for VOO.
Over three years, EMCR compounded at +22.44% per year against +20.98% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +8.26% and +12.76% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +15.48% annualized vs +10.41%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMCR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 16.9% compared with 16.4% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for EMCR and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMCR charges 0.15% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $3 annually, a gap of $12 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMCR currently yields 1.46% against 1.04% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 1,349 holdings in EMCR and 505 in VOO, totalling 97.4% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 1,349 positions we hold weights for in EMCR and 505 in VOO, against full books of 1,373 and 509.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 496 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for EMCR (99.4% of the fund), and 18 for EMCR that do not appear in VOO (0.8%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EMCR and VOO you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMCR or VOO?
EMCR has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $12 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EMCR or VOO?
Over the past year EMCR returned +29.23% vs +18.60% for VOO, so EMCR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), EMCR annualized +10.41% vs +15.48% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EMCR or VOO?
EMCR has been the more volatile fund at 16.9% annualized versus 16.4% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EMCR -34.3% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EMCR and VOO?
EMCR and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMCR or VOO?
EMCR yields 1.46% while VOO yields 1.04%, so EMCR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VOO better than EMCR?
VOO has a lower expense ratio. EMCR led over 1Y and 3Y, VOO over 5Y and the full window. EMCR is less concentrated, with 33.4% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.