EMCR vs VYM
Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. EMCR delivered stronger 1-year returns. EMCR offers more diversification with 1,381 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMCR | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.15% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $61M | $81.6B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.59% | 2.24% | |
| Holdings | 1,381 | 616 | |
| YTD Return | +15.86% | +16.42% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.46% | +24.22% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.18% | +19.03% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.72% | +12.21% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 17.0% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -34.3% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | Xtrackers ETFs | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 4, 2018 | Nov 10, 2006 |
EMCR vs VYM Performance
Xtrackers Emerging Markets Carbon Reduction and Climate Improvers ETF (EMCR) is a ETF from Xtrackers ETFs and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMCR returned +31.46% while VYM returned +24.22%. Year to date, EMCR is up 15.86% versus a gain of 16.42% for VYM.
Over three years, EMCR compounded at +22.18% per year against +19.03% for VYM; over five years the annualized figures are +8.72% and +12.21% respectively. Across the full 8-year window we track, EMCR has the edge at +10.31% annualized vs +7.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMCR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 17.0% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -34.3% for EMCR and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.69. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMCR charges 0.15% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $15 vs $4 annually, a gap of $11 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMCR currently yields 1.59% against 2.24% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
EMCR and VYM share 3 holdings out of 1950 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMCR or VYM?
EMCR has an expense ratio of 0.15% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $11 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMCR or VYM?
Over the past year EMCR returned +31.46% vs +24.22% for VYM, so EMCR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (8 years), EMCR annualized +10.31% vs +7.10% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMCR or VYM?
EMCR has been the more volatile fund at 17.0% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: EMCR -34.3% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both EMCR and VYM?
EMCR and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.69, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMCR and VYM?
EMCR and VYM share 3 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 1950 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMCR or VYM?
EMCR yields 1.59% while VYM yields 2.24%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.