EMET vs QQQ
VanEck Copper and Electrification Metals ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. EMET delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 103 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMET | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $31M | $455.8B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.69% | 0.41% | |
| Holdings | 64 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +13.46% | +19.68% | |
| 1Y Return | +65.29% | +26.75% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.38% | +26.25% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +15.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.3% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.9% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
EMET vs QQQ Performance
VanEck Copper and Electrification Metals ETF (EMET) is a ETF from VanEck and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EMET returned +65.29% while QQQ returned +26.75%. Year to date, EMET is up 13.46% versus a gain of 19.68% for QQQ.
Over three years, EMET compounded at +19.38% per year against +26.25% for QQQ. Across the full 5-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.15% annualized vs +5.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.3% compared with 30.6% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.9% for EMET and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.39. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMET charges 0.62% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $18 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMET currently yields 1.69% against 0.41% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
EMET and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 159 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMET or QQQ?
EMET has an expense ratio of 0.62% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $44 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMET or QQQ?
Over the past year EMET returned +65.29% vs +26.75% for QQQ, so EMET leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), EMET annualized +5.58% vs +13.15% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMET or QQQ?
EMET has been the more volatile fund at 31.3% annualized versus 30.6% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: EMET -53.9% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both EMET and QQQ?
EMET and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.39, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMET and QQQ?
EMET and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 159 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMET or QQQ?
EMET yields 1.69% while QQQ yields 0.41%, so EMET currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.