EMET vs QQQ
VanEck Copper and Electrification Metals ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, EMET or QQQ?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. EMET led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.0%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMET | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $36M | $498.6B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.48% | 0.42% |
| Holdings | 120 | 321 |
| YTD Return | +10.93% | +22.67%Best |
| 1Y Return | +33.24%Best | +24.33% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +22.45% | +29.05%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +4.94% | +17.00%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.8% | 20.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -53.9% | -35.1%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $12,726 | $21,924Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 53.0% | 47.2%Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2021 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 11, 2021 to Oct 2, 2026 (4.9 years).
EMET vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.9 years both funds cover.
EMET vs QQQ Performance
VanEck Copper and Electrification Metals ETF (EMET) is an ETF from VanEck and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year EMET returned +33.24% while QQQ returned +24.33%. Year to date, EMET is up 10.93% versus a gain of 22.67% for QQQ.
Over three years, EMET compounded at +22.45% per year against +29.05% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +4.94% and +17.00% respectively.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.8% compared with 20.8% for QQQ. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.9% for EMET and -35.1% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.38. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMET charges 0.62% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $18 annually, a gap of $44 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMET currently yields 1.48% against 0.42% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
We hold position weights for 58 holdings in EMET and 102 in QQQ, totalling 99.5% and 99.9% of the two funds. The two books name no position in common, so there is no overlap percentage to show.
0 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in EMET and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 120 and 321.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 96 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for EMET (97.8% of the fund), and 5 for EMET that do not appear in QQQ (17.9%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EMET and QQQ you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMET or QQQ?
EMET has an expense ratio of 0.62% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $44 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EMET or QQQ?
Over the past year EMET returned +33.24% vs +24.33% for QQQ, so EMET leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EMET or QQQ?
EMET has been the more volatile fund at 31.8% annualized versus 20.8% for QQQ. Worst drawdown: EMET -53.9% vs QQQ -35.1%.
Should I hold both EMET and QQQ?
EMET and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.38, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMET or QQQ?
EMET yields 1.48% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so EMET currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than EMET?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. EMET led over 1Y, QQQ over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 53.0%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.