EMET vs VXUS
VanEck Copper and Electrification Metals ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. EMET delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMET | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $32M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.81% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 61 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +24.90% | +15.52% | |
| 1Y Return | +80.24% | +26.73% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +24.50% | +20.35% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.40% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 32.4% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.9% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2021 | Jan 26, 2011 |
EMET vs VXUS Performance
VanEck Copper and Electrification Metals ETF (EMET) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMET returned +80.24% while VXUS returned +26.73%. Year to date, EMET is up 24.90% versus a gain of 15.52% for VXUS.
Over three years, EMET compounded at +24.50% per year against +20.35% for VXUS. Across the full 5-year window we track, EMET has the edge at +7.67% annualized vs +4.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 32.4% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.9% for EMET and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.74. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMET charges 0.62% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $5 annually, a gap of $57 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMET currently yields 1.81% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
EMET and VXUS share 44 holdings out of 7883 unique holdings combined, representing a 1.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMET or VXUS?
EMET has an expense ratio of 0.62% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $57 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMET or VXUS?
Over the past year EMET returned +80.24% vs +26.73% for VXUS, so EMET leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), EMET annualized +7.67% vs +4.90% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMET or VXUS?
EMET has been the more volatile fund at 32.4% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: EMET -53.9% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both EMET and VXUS?
EMET and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.74, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMET and VXUS?
EMET and VXUS share 44 common holdings with a 1.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7883 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMET or VXUS?
EMET yields 1.81% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.