EMET vs VTI
VanEck Copper and Electrification Metals ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EMET delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMET | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $31M | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.69% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 64 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +16.57% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +70.95% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.48% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.5% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.9% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
EMET vs VTI Performance
VanEck Copper and Electrification Metals ETF (EMET) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMET returned +70.95% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, EMET is up 16.57% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, EMET compounded at +20.48% per year against +21.27% for VTI. Across the full 5-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.14% annualized vs +6.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.5% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.9% for EMET and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMET charges 0.62% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $3 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMET currently yields 1.69% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EMET and VTI share 3 holdings out of 2836 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMET or VTI?
EMET has an expense ratio of 0.62% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $59 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMET or VTI?
Over the past year EMET returned +70.95% vs +22.19% for VTI, so EMET leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), EMET annualized +6.19% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMET or VTI?
EMET has been the more volatile fund at 31.5% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EMET -53.9% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EMET and VTI?
EMET and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMET and VTI?
EMET and VTI share 3 common holdings with a 0.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2836 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMET or VTI?
EMET yields 1.69% while VTI yields 1.07%, so EMET currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.