EMET vs VTI
VanEck Copper and Electrification Metals ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, EMET or VTI?
Multi Alternative against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EMET led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMET | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $32M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.48% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 60 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +13.09%Best | +12.30% |
| 1Y Return | +51.30%Best | +16.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.08% | +21.01%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.9% | 16.0%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -53.9% | -25.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 4.9 years | $12,934 | $16,816Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 52.5% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Alternative | Equity |
| Style | Multi Alternative | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2021 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown, and the $10,000 over 4.9 years row, are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 11, 2021 to Sep 18, 2026 (4.9 years).
EMET vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 4.9 years both funds cover.
EMET vs VTI Performance
VanEck Copper and Electrification Metals ETF (EMET) is an ETF from VanEck and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMET returned +51.30% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, EMET is up 13.09% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Over three years, EMET compounded at +20.08% per year against +21.01% for VTI.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.9% compared with 16.0% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.9% for EMET and -25.4% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.50. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMET charges 0.62% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $3 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMET currently yields 1.48% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
12.8% of EMET's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.1% of VTI's money is in holdings EMET also owns.
EMET and VTI share little of their money.
3 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in EMET and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 60 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,147 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for EMET (97.3% of the fund), and 2 for EMET that do not appear in VTI (5.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of EMET and VTI you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMET or VTI?
EMET has an expense ratio of 0.62% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $59 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EMET or VTI?
Over the past year EMET returned +51.30% vs +16.08% for VTI, so EMET leads on 1-year performance. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EMET or VTI?
EMET has been the more volatile fund at 31.9% annualized versus 16.0% for VTI. Worst drawdown: EMET -53.9% vs VTI -25.4%.
Should I hold both EMET and VTI?
EMET and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.50, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EMET and VTI?
12.8% of EMET's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.1% of VTI's is in holdings EMET also owns. They hold 3 positions in common, counted across the 58 positions we hold weights for in EMET and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMET or VTI?
EMET yields 1.48% while VTI yields 1.03%, so EMET currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than EMET?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. EMET led over 1Y, VTI over 3Y and the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 52.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.