EMET vs IVV
VanEck Copper and Electrification Metals ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EMET delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMET | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $31M | $865.2B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.69% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 64 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +16.57% | +13.72% | |
| 1Y Return | +70.95% | +21.64% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +20.48% | +21.55% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.27% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.5% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.9% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2021 | May 15, 2000 |
EMET vs IVV Performance
VanEck Copper and Electrification Metals ETF (EMET) is a ETF from VanEck and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EMET returned +70.95% while IVV returned +21.64%. Year to date, EMET is up 16.57% versus a gain of 13.72% for IVV.
Over three years, EMET compounded at +20.48% per year against +21.55% for IVV. Across the full 5-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +7.04% annualized vs +6.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.5% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.9% for EMET and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMET charges 0.62% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $3 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMET currently yields 1.69% against 1.09% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMET or IVV?
EMET has an expense ratio of 0.62% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $59 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMET or IVV?
Over the past year EMET returned +70.95% vs +21.64% for IVV, so EMET leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), EMET annualized +6.19% vs +7.04% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMET or IVV?
EMET has been the more volatile fund at 31.5% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EMET -53.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EMET and IVV?
EMET and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMET and IVV?
EMET and IVV share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 559 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMET or IVV?
EMET yields 1.69% while IVV yields 1.09%, so EMET currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.