EMET vs VYM
VanEck Copper and Electrification Metals ETF vs Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF
Quick Verdict
VYM has a lower expense ratio. EMET delivered stronger 1-year returns. VYM offers more diversification with 558 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMET | VYM | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.04% | |
| AUM | $31M | $79.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.69% | 2.86% | |
| Holdings | 64 | 568 | |
| YTD Return | +17.16% | +16.10% | |
| 1Y Return | +74.26% | +25.99% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.86% | +18.29% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.35% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.6% | 14.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.9% | -58.8% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2021 | Nov 10, 2006 |
EMET vs VYM Performance
VanEck Copper and Electrification Metals ETF (EMET) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMET returned +74.26% while VYM returned +25.99%. Year to date, EMET is up 17.16% versus a gain of 16.10% for VYM.
Over three years, EMET compounded at +19.86% per year against +18.29% for VYM. Across the full 5-year window we track, VYM has the edge at +7.08% annualized vs +6.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.6% compared with 14.6% for VYM. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.9% for EMET and -58.8% for VYM. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.56. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMET charges 0.62% per year while VYM charges 0.04%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $4 annually, a gap of $58 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMET currently yields 1.69% against 2.86% for VYM.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMET or VYM?
EMET has an expense ratio of 0.62% while VYM charges 0.04%. VYM is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $58 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMET or VYM?
Over the past year EMET returned +74.26% vs +25.99% for VYM, so EMET leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), EMET annualized +6.31% vs +7.08% for VYM. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMET or VYM?
EMET has been the more volatile fund at 31.6% annualized versus 14.6% for VYM. Worst drawdown: EMET -53.9% vs VYM -58.8%.
Should I hold both EMET and VYM?
EMET and VYM have a monthly-return correlation of 0.56, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMET and VYM?
EMET and VYM share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 612 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMET or VYM?
EMET yields 1.69% while VYM yields 2.86%, so VYM currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.