EMET vs SCHD
VanEck Copper and Electrification Metals ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Quick Verdict
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. EMET delivered stronger 1-year returns. SCHD offers more diversification with 100 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMET | SCHD | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.06% | |
| AUM | $31M | $103.7B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.69% | 3.31% | |
| Holdings | 64 | 104 | |
| YTD Return | +16.02% | +24.26% | |
| 1Y Return | +76.16% | +31.38% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +18.49% | +15.08% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +9.72% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.5% | 13.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.9% | -33.4% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Charles Schwab Asset Management | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2021 | Oct 20, 2011 |
EMET vs SCHD Performance
VanEck Copper and Electrification Metals ETF (EMET) is a ETF from VanEck and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is a ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year EMET returned +76.16% while SCHD returned +31.38%. Year to date, EMET is up 16.02% versus a gain of 24.26% for SCHD.
Over three years, EMET compounded at +18.49% per year against +15.08% for SCHD. Across the full 5-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +11.39% annualized vs +6.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.5% compared with 13.6% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.9% for EMET and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.54. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMET charges 0.62% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $6 annually, a gap of $56 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMET currently yields 1.69% against 3.31% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
EMET and SCHD share 0 holdings out of 156 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMET or SCHD?
EMET has an expense ratio of 0.62% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $56 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMET or SCHD?
Over the past year EMET returned +76.16% vs +31.38% for SCHD, so EMET leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), EMET annualized +6.10% vs +11.39% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMET or SCHD?
EMET has been the more volatile fund at 31.5% annualized versus 13.6% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: EMET -53.9% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both EMET and SCHD?
EMET and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.54, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMET and SCHD?
EMET and SCHD share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 156 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMET or SCHD?
EMET yields 1.69% while SCHD yields 3.31%, so SCHD currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.