EMET vs VOO
VanEck Copper and Electrification Metals ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. EMET delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 505 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EMET | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.62% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $31M | $979.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.69% | 1.09% | |
| Holdings | 64 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +17.16% | +13.79% | |
| 1Y Return | +74.26% | +23.01% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +19.86% | +21.78% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +13.39% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 31.6% | 14.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -53.9% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | VanEck | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Alternative | Equity | |
| Inception | Nov 9, 2021 | Sep 7, 2010 |
EMET vs VOO Performance
VanEck Copper and Electrification Metals ETF (EMET) is a ETF from VanEck and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EMET returned +74.26% while VOO returned +23.01%. Year to date, EMET is up 17.16% versus a gain of 13.79% for VOO.
Over three years, EMET compounded at +19.86% per year against +21.78% for VOO. Across the full 5-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.57% annualized vs +6.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EMET has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 31.6% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -53.9% for EMET and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.49. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EMET charges 0.62% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $62 vs $3 annually, a gap of $59 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EMET currently yields 1.69% against 1.09% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EMET or VOO?
EMET has an expense ratio of 0.62% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $59 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EMET or VOO?
Over the past year EMET returned +74.26% vs +23.01% for VOO, so EMET leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (5 years), EMET annualized +6.31% vs +13.57% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EMET or VOO?
EMET has been the more volatile fund at 31.6% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: EMET -53.9% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both EMET and VOO?
EMET and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.49, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between EMET and VOO?
EMET and VOO share 2 common holdings with a 0.2% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 559 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EMET or VOO?
EMET yields 1.69% while VOO yields 1.09%, so EMET currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.