ENFR vs SCHD
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF vs Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF
Which is better, ENFR or SCHD?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Value.
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. ENFR led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, SCHD over the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.7%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ENFR | SCHD |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.06%Best |
| AUM | $542M | $112.2B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.91% | 3.13% |
| Holdings | 29 | 103 |
| YTD Return | +29.87%Best | +27.56% |
| 1Y Return | +31.06%Best | +30.29% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.25%Best | +16.37% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +22.46%Best | +10.23% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.1% | 14.3%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -74.3% | -33.4%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $27,540Best | $16,274 |
| Top 10 Weight | 59.7% | 41.5%Best |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Charles Schwab Asset Management |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Value |
| Inception | Oct 31, 2013 | Oct 20, 2011 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 1, 2013 to Sep 4, 2026 (12.8 years).
ENFR vs SCHD growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.8 years both funds cover.
ENFR vs SCHD Performance
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors and Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) is an ETF from Charles Schwab Asset Management. Over the past year ENFR returned +31.06% while SCHD returned +30.29%. Year to date, ENFR is up 29.87% versus a gain of 27.56% for SCHD.
Over three years, ENFR compounded at +27.25% per year against +16.37% for SCHD; over five years the annualized figures are +22.46% and +10.23% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, SCHD has the edge at +10.43% annualized vs +6.31%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ENFR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.1% compared with 14.3% for SCHD. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -74.3% for ENFR and -33.4% for SCHD. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.72. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ENFR charges 0.35% per year while SCHD charges 0.06%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $6 annually, a gap of $29 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ENFR currently yields 3.91% against 3.13% for SCHD.
Holdings Overlap
5.1% of ENFR's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 1.4% of SCHD's money is in holdings ENFR also owns.
ENFR and SCHD share little of their money.
1 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in ENFR and 100 in SCHD, against full books of 29 and 103.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 98 positions for SCHD that do not appear in our book for ENFR (98.5% of the fund), and 21 for ENFR that do not appear in SCHD (73.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ENFR | Weight in SCHD | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| OKEOneok Inc. | 5.14% | 1.36% | 3.78% |
You are not choosing between two funds in isolation.
Whichever of ENFR and SCHD you pick has to sit alongside everything else you own. Add the rest and see what the combination actually holds.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ENFR or SCHD?
ENFR has an expense ratio of 0.35% while SCHD charges 0.06%. SCHD is the cheaper option, by $29 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ENFR or SCHD?
Over the past year ENFR returned +31.06% vs +30.29% for SCHD, so ENFR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), ENFR annualized +6.31% vs +10.43% for SCHD. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ENFR or SCHD?
ENFR has been the more volatile fund at 24.1% annualized versus 14.3% for SCHD. Worst drawdown: ENFR -74.3% vs SCHD -33.4%.
Should I hold both ENFR and SCHD?
ENFR and SCHD have a monthly-return correlation of 0.72, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ENFR and SCHD?
5.1% of ENFR's money is in holdings SCHD also owns. 1.4% of SCHD's is in holdings ENFR also owns. They hold 1 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in ENFR and 100 in SCHD.
Which pays a higher dividend, ENFR or SCHD?
ENFR yields 3.91% while SCHD yields 3.13%, so ENFR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is SCHD better than ENFR?
SCHD has a lower expense ratio. ENFR led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, SCHD over the full window. SCHD is less concentrated, with 41.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 59.7%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.