ENFR vs QQQ
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. ENFR delivered stronger 1-year returns. QQQ offers more diversification with 108 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ENFR | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $520M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.91% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 29 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | +28.18% | +16.64% | |
| 1Y Return | +29.97% | +27.27% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.41% | +25.96% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +22.80% | +14.54% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.2% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -74.3% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 31, 2013 | Mar 10, 1999 |
ENFR vs QQQ Performance
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year ENFR returned +29.97% while QQQ returned +27.27%. Year to date, ENFR is up 28.18% versus a gain of 16.64% for QQQ.
Over three years, ENFR compounded at +27.41% per year against +25.96% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are +22.80% and +14.54% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.03% annualized vs +6.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 24.2% for ENFR. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -74.3% for ENFR and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.45. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ENFR charges 0.35% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $18 annually, a gap of $17 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ENFR currently yields 3.91% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
ENFR and QQQ share 0 holdings out of 130 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.0% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ENFR or QQQ?
ENFR has an expense ratio of 0.35% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $17 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ENFR or QQQ?
Over the past year ENFR returned +29.97% vs +27.27% for QQQ, so ENFR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), ENFR annualized +6.22% vs +13.03% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ENFR or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 24.2% for ENFR. Worst drawdown: ENFR -74.3% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both ENFR and QQQ?
ENFR and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.45, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ENFR and QQQ?
ENFR and QQQ share 0 common holdings with a 0.0% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 130 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ENFR or QQQ?
ENFR yields 3.91% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so ENFR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.