ENFR vs IVV
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ENFR delivered stronger 1-year returns. IVV offers more diversification with 508 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ENFR | IVV | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $520M | $907.0B | |
| Dividend Yield | 3.91% | 1.10% | |
| Holdings | 29 | 508 | |
| YTD Return | +29.25% | +12.28% | |
| 1Y Return | +31.64% | +20.94% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.54% | +21.81% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +23.58% | +13.05% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -74.3% | -56.5% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | iShares by BlackRock (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 31, 2013 | May 15, 2000 |
ENFR vs IVV Performance
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is a ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ENFR returned +31.64% while IVV returned +20.94%. Year to date, ENFR is up 29.25% versus a gain of 12.28% for IVV.
Over three years, ENFR compounded at +27.54% per year against +21.81% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +23.58% and +13.05% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +6.98% annualized vs +6.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ENFR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.2% compared with 15.1% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -74.3% for ENFR and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ENFR charges 0.35% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ENFR currently yields 3.91% against 1.10% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
ENFR and IVV share 4 holdings out of 529 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.4% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ENFR or IVV?
ENFR has an expense ratio of 0.35% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $32 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ENFR or IVV?
Over the past year ENFR returned +31.64% vs +20.94% for IVV, so ENFR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), ENFR annualized +6.29% vs +6.98% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ENFR or IVV?
ENFR has been the more volatile fund at 24.2% annualized versus 15.1% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ENFR -74.3% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ENFR and IVV?
ENFR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ENFR and IVV?
ENFR and IVV share 4 common holdings with a 0.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 529 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ENFR or IVV?
ENFR yields 3.91% while IVV yields 1.10%, so ENFR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.