ENFR vs IVV
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ENFR or IVV?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ENFR led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, IVV over the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ENFR | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $552M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.84% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 29 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +29.18%Best | +11.57% |
| 1Y Return | +30.66%Best | +17.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +27.81%Best | +20.71% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +22.58%Best | +12.80% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.1% | 14.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -74.3% | -33.9%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $27,676Best | $18,262 |
| Top 10 Weight | 60.3% | 37.9%Best |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 31, 2013 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 1, 2013 to Sep 10, 2026 (12.9 years).
ENFR vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.9 years both funds cover.
ENFR vs IVV Performance
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ENFR returned +30.66% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, ENFR is up 29.18% versus a gain of 11.57% for IVV.
Over three years, ENFR compounded at +27.81% per year against +20.71% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +22.58% and +12.80% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +12.68% annualized vs +6.26%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ENFR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.1% compared with 14.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -74.3% for ENFR and -33.9% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.65. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ENFR charges 0.35% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ENFR currently yields 3.84% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
21.3% of ENFR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.4% of IVV's money is in holdings ENFR also owns.
ENFR and IVV share little of their money.
4 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in ENFR and 505 in IVV, against full books of 29 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 491 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ENFR (99.0% of the fund), and 18 for ENFR that do not appear in IVV (57.5%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
21.3% of ENFR is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ENFR or IVV?
ENFR has an expense ratio of 0.35% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ENFR or IVV?
Over the past year ENFR returned +30.66% vs +17.57% for IVV, so ENFR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), ENFR annualized +6.26% vs +12.68% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ENFR or IVV?
ENFR has been the more volatile fund at 24.1% annualized versus 14.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ENFR -74.3% vs IVV -33.9%.
Should I hold both ENFR and IVV?
ENFR and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.65, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ENFR and IVV?
21.3% of ENFR's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 0.4% of IVV's is in holdings ENFR also owns. They hold 4 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in ENFR and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ENFR or IVV?
ENFR yields 3.84% while IVV yields 1.06%, so ENFR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ENFR?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. ENFR led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, IVV over the full window. IVV is less concentrated, with 37.9% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.