ENFR vs VTI
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ENFR or VTI?
Mid Cap Value against Large Cap Blend.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ENFR led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.3%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ENFR | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $552M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 3.84% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 29 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | +26.97%Best | +12.30% |
| 1Y Return | +26.86%Best | +16.08% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +26.08%Best | +21.01% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +22.44%Best | +12.36% |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.1% | 14.9%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -74.3% | -35.0%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $27,518Best | $17,908 |
| Top 10 Weight | 60.3% | 33.3%Best |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Value | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 31, 2013 | May 24, 2001 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Nov 1, 2013 to Sep 18, 2026 (12.9 years).
ENFR vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 12.9 years both funds cover.
ENFR vs VTI Performance
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) is an ETF from ALPS Advisors and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ENFR returned +26.86% while VTI returned +16.08%. Year to date, ENFR is up 26.97% versus a gain of 12.30% for VTI.
Over three years, ENFR compounded at +26.08% per year against +21.01% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are +22.44% and +12.36% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +12.25% annualized vs +6.11%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ENFR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.1% compared with 14.9% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -74.3% for ENFR and -35.0% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.67. They move together some of the time, and apart the rest.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ENFR charges 0.35% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $3 annually, a gap of $32 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ENFR currently yields 3.84% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
39.8% of ENFR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.5% of VTI's money is in holdings ENFR also owns.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
11 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in ENFR and 3,463 in VTI, against full books of 29 and 3,543.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 1,143 positions for VTI that do not appear in our book for ENFR (97.0% of the fund), and 11 for ENFR that do not appear in VTI (39.0%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ENFR | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| WMBWilliams Cos. Inc. | 6.05% | 0.12% | 5.93% |
| LNGCheniere Energy Inc. | 5.80% | 0.08% | 5.72% |
| TRGPTarga Resources Corp Preferred | 5.20% | 0.08% | 5.12% |
| OKEOneok Inc. | 5.14% | 0.08% | 5.06% |
| KMIKinder Morgan Inc./de | 4.91% | 0.08% | 4.83% |
| DTMDT Midstream Inc | 4.45% | 0.02% | 4.43% |
| AMAntero Midstream Corporationam | 3.10% | 0.01% | 3.09% |
| VGVenture Global Inc | 2.40% | 0.00% | 2.40% |
| KNTKAltus Midstream Company | 1.39% | 0.00% | 1.39% |
| WTTRSelect Energy Services Inc | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.92% |
39.8% of ENFR is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ENFR or VTI?
ENFR has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $32 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ENFR or VTI?
Over the past year ENFR returned +26.86% vs +16.08% for VTI, so ENFR leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), ENFR annualized +6.11% vs +12.25% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ENFR or VTI?
ENFR has been the more volatile fund at 24.1% annualized versus 14.9% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ENFR -74.3% vs VTI -35.0%.
Should I hold both ENFR and VTI?
ENFR and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.67, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ENFR and VTI?
39.8% of ENFR's money is in holdings VTI also owns. 0.5% of VTI's is in holdings ENFR also owns. They hold 11 positions in common, counted across the 28 positions we hold weights for in ENFR and 3,463 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ENFR or VTI?
ENFR yields 3.84% while VTI yields 1.03%, so ENFR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ENFR?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. ENFR led over 1Y, 3Y and 5Y, VTI over the full window. VTI is less concentrated, with 33.3% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 60.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.