ENFR vs VXUS
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 7861 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ENFR | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $498M | $156.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 4.54% | 2.60% | |
| Holdings | 27 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +24.01% | +14.57% | |
| 1Y Return | +26.17% | +27.82% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +25.77% | +19.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +21.79% | +9.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 24.2% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -74.3% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | ALPS Advisors | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 31, 2013 | Jan 26, 2011 |
ENFR vs VXUS Performance
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) is a ETF from ALPS Advisors and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ENFR returned +26.17% while VXUS returned +27.82%. Year to date, ENFR is up 24.01% versus a gain of 14.57% for VXUS.
Over three years, ENFR compounded at +25.77% per year against +19.27% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +21.79% and +9.28% respectively. Across the full 13-year window we track, ENFR has the edge at +5.97% annualized vs +4.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ENFR has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 24.2% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -74.3% for ENFR and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.63. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ENFR charges 0.35% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $35 vs $5 annually, a gap of $30 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ENFR currently yields 4.54% against 2.60% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
ENFR and VXUS share 6 holdings out of 7883 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.5% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ENFR or VXUS?
ENFR has an expense ratio of 0.35% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $30 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ENFR or VXUS?
Over the past year ENFR returned +26.17% vs +27.82% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (13 years), ENFR annualized +5.97% vs +4.86% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ENFR or VXUS?
ENFR has been the more volatile fund at 24.2% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: ENFR -74.3% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both ENFR and VXUS?
ENFR and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.63, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ENFR and VXUS?
ENFR and VXUS share 6 common holdings with a 0.5% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7883 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ENFR or VXUS?
ENFR yields 4.54% while VXUS yields 2.60%, so ENFR currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.