EPAI vs VOO

EPAI vs VOO

Which is better, EPAI or VOO?

Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. EPAI is less concentrated, with 36.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%.

Lower Fees: VOOLess Concentrated: EPAI

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricEPAIVOO
Expense Ratio0.88%0.03%Best
AUM$5M$997.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.04%
Holdings38509
YTD Return+31.69%Best+14.14%
1Y Return-+17.31%
3Y Return (annualized)-+23.16%
5Y Return (annualized)-+13.85%
Top 10 Weight36.5%Best37.6%
Fund FamilyHarbor FundsVanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleMid Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 17, 2025Sep 7, 2010

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

EPAI vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

EPAI vs VOO Performance

Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF (EPAI) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Year to date, EPAI is up 31.69% versus a gain of 14.14% for VOO.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

EPAI charges 0.88% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $88 vs $3 annually, a gap of $85 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EPAI currently yields 0.00% against 1.04% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

EPAI already in VOO61.1%
VOO already in EPAI3.6%

61.1% of EPAI's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 3.6% of VOO's money is in holdings EPAI also owns.

The two portfolios partly overlap.

23 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in EPAI and 494 in VOO, against full books of 38 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 465 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for EPAI (95.6% of the fund), and 12 for EPAI that do not appear in VOO (30.4%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in EPAIWeight in VOODifference
AMATApplied Materials, Inc.4.23%0.63%3.60%
TERTeradyne Inc - Common4.28%0.09%4.19%
LRCXLrcx Uw Equity3.79%0.57%3.22%
VRTVertiv Holdings Co3.83%0.14%3.69%
FLEX:SIFlex Ltd3.22%0.07%3.15%
GLWCorning Inc.2.93%0.17%2.76%
APHAmphenol Corp. Class A2.77%0.31%2.46%
MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc2.91%0.11%2.80%
ETNEaton Corp Plc2.66%0.25%2.41%
JJacobs Engineering Group Inc.2.88%0.02%2.86%

61.1% of EPAI is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

EPAIVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, EPAI or VOO?

EPAI has an expense ratio of 0.88% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $85 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between EPAI and VOO?

61.1% of EPAI's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 3.6% of VOO's is in holdings EPAI also owns. They hold 23 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in EPAI and 494 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, EPAI or VOO?

EPAI yields 0.00% while VOO yields 1.04%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than EPAI?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. EPAI is less concentrated, with 36.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.6%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.