EPAI vs QQQ
Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Which is better, EPAI or QQQ?
Mid Cap Growth against Large Cap Growth.
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. EPAI is less concentrated, with 40.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EPAI | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.88% | 0.18%Best |
| AUM | $5M | $486.1B |
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | 0.44% |
| Holdings | 38 | 107 |
| YTD Return | +29.71%Best | +17.54% |
| 1Y Return | - | +25.59% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | - | +24.63% |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +14.18% |
| Top 10 Weight | 40.5%Best | 46.5% |
| Fund Family | Harbor Funds | Invesco (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Mid Cap Growth | Large Cap Growth |
| Inception | Dec 17, 2025 | Mar 10, 1999 |
Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.
EPAI vs QQQ growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.
EPAI vs QQQ Performance
Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF (EPAI) is an ETF from Harbor Funds and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, EPAI is up 29.71% versus a gain of 17.54% for QQQ.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EPAI charges 0.88% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $88 vs $18 annually, a gap of $70 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EPAI currently yields 0.00% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
25.1% of EPAI's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 5.4% of QQQ's money is in holdings EPAI also owns.
EPAI and QQQ share little of their money.
7 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in EPAI and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 38 and 107.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 90 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for EPAI (92.8% of the fund), and 28 for EPAI that do not appear in QQQ (71.4%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EPAI | Weight in QQQ | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMATApplied Materials, Inc. | 4.84% | 1.86% | 2.98% |
| LRCXLrcx Uw Equity | 4.16% | 1.69% | 2.47% |
| TERTeradyne Inc - Common | 4.95% | 0.27% | 4.68% |
| ASL:ASAsml Holding Nv Unsponsored Adr Ordinary Shares | 3.95% | 0.68% | 3.27% |
| MPWRMonolithic Power Systems Inc | 3.06% | 0.29% | 2.77% |
| NXPINxp Semiconductors Nv Sedol B505Pn7 | 2.13% | 0.26% | 1.87% |
| SNPSSynopsys | 2.04% | 0.34% | 1.70% |
25.1% of EPAI is already inside QQQ.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EPAI or QQQ?
EPAI has an expense ratio of 0.88% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $70 a year on a $10,000 investment.
What is the holdings overlap between EPAI and QQQ?
25.1% of EPAI's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 5.4% of QQQ's is in holdings EPAI also owns. They hold 7 positions in common, counted across the 37 positions we hold weights for in EPAI and 102 in QQQ.
Which pays a higher dividend, EPAI or QQQ?
EPAI yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is QQQ better than EPAI?
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. EPAI is less concentrated, with 40.5% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 46.5%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.