EQTY vs VTI
Kovitz Core Equity ETF vs Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 2783 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EQTY | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $1.4B | $663.5B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.02% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 53 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | +10.74% | +14.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +15.60% | +22.19% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +16.58% | +21.27% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | - | +12.23% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 13.1% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -17.3% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Kovitz Investment Group | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Dec 28, 2011 | May 24, 2001 |
EQTY vs VTI Performance
Kovitz Core Equity ETF (EQTY) is a ETF from Kovitz Investment Group and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year EQTY returned +15.60% while VTI returned +22.19%. Year to date, EQTY is up 10.74% versus a gain of 14.22% for VTI.
Over three years, EQTY compounded at +16.58% per year against +21.27% for VTI. Across the full 4-year window we track, EQTY has the edge at +18.11% annualized vs +8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
VTI has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 15.3% compared with 13.1% for EQTY. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -17.3% for EQTY and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.90. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EQTY charges 0.99% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $99 vs $3 annually, a gap of $96 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EQTY currently yields 0.02% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
EQTY and VTI share 47 holdings out of 2787 unique holdings combined, representing a 22.1% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EQTY or VTI?
EQTY has an expense ratio of 0.99% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $96 per year of difference.
Which performed better, EQTY or VTI?
Over the past year EQTY returned +15.60% vs +22.19% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (4 years), EQTY annualized +18.11% vs +8.14% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, EQTY or VTI?
VTI has been the more volatile fund at 15.3% annualized versus 13.1% for EQTY. Worst drawdown: EQTY -17.3% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both EQTY and VTI?
EQTY and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.90, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between EQTY and VTI?
EQTY and VTI share 47 common holdings with a 22.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2787 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, EQTY or VTI?
EQTY yields 0.02% while VTI yields 1.07%, so VTI currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.