ERTH vs VTI
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Which is better, ERTH or VTI?
VTI has been ahead.
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ERTH | VTI |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $131M | $666.9B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.97% | 1.03% |
| Holdings | 196 | 3,543 |
| YTD Return | -5.95% | +11.65%Best |
| 1Y Return | +0.15% | +17.34%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -0.51% | +20.35%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -6.29% | +11.72%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.7% | 15.8%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -64.5% | -56.6%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $7,227 | $17,404Best |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 24, 2006 | May 24, 2001 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 24, 2006 to Sep 10, 2026 (19.9 years).
ERTH vs VTI growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.9 years both funds cover.
ERTH vs VTI Performance
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ERTH returned +0.15% while VTI returned +17.34%. Year to date, ERTH is down 5.95% versus a gain of 11.65% for VTI.
Over three years, ERTH compounded at -0.51% per year against +20.35% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -6.29% and +11.72% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +9.36% annualized vs +4.07%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ERTH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.7% compared with 15.8% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -64.5% for ERTH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ERTH charges 0.66% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $3 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ERTH currently yields 1.97% against 1.03% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
At least 33.6% of ERTH's money is in holdings VTI also owns.
Stated as a floor: for VTI, our book for it covers 90.6% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
The two portfolios partly overlap.
27 positions in common, counted across the 174 positions we hold weights for in ERTH and 2,787 in VTI, against full books of 196 and 3,543.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in ERTH | Weight in VTI | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVDANvidia Corp. | 4.81% | 6.32% | 1.51% |
| TSLATesla Inc | 4.09% | 1.63% | 2.46% |
| DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc. | 5.27% | 0.09% | 5.18% |
| FSLRFirst Solar, Inc | 3.46% | 0.03% | 3.43% |
| WYWeyerhaeuser Co. | 2.65% | 0.02% | 2.63% |
| RIVNRivian Automotive | 2.08% | 0.02% | 2.06% |
| NXTNextracker Inc | 1.91% | 0.02% | 1.89% |
| WMSAdvanced Drainag Tm B 1ln 7/26 | 1.48% | 0.02% | 1.46% |
| VNOVornado Realty Trust | 0.93% | 0.00% | 0.93% |
| ORAOrmat Technologies Inc | 0.87% | 0.00% | 0.87% |
33.6% of ERTH is already inside VTI.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ERTH or VTI?
ERTH has an expense ratio of 0.66% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option, by $63 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ERTH or VTI?
Over the past year ERTH returned +0.15% vs +17.34% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), ERTH annualized +4.07% vs +9.36% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ERTH or VTI?
ERTH has been the more volatile fund at 22.7% annualized versus 15.8% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ERTH -64.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ERTH and VTI?
ERTH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ERTH and VTI?
At least 33.6% of ERTH's money is in holdings VTI also owns. Our book for VTI is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 27 positions in common, counted across the 174 positions we hold weights for in ERTH and 2,787 in VTI.
Which pays a higher dividend, ERTH or VTI?
ERTH yields 1.97% while VTI yields 1.03%, so ERTH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is VTI better than ERTH?
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.