ERTH vs VTI
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF vs Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF
Quick Verdict
VTI has a lower expense ratio. VTI delivered stronger 1-year returns. VTI offers more diversification with 3,543 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ERTH | VTI | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $138M | $666.9B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.96% | 1.07% | |
| Holdings | 182 | 3,543 | |
| YTD Return | -1.07% | +13.67% | |
| 1Y Return | +5.93% | +22.17% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +1.51% | +21.93% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -4.88% | +12.51% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.7% | 15.3% | |
| Max Drawdown | -64.5% | -56.6% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 24, 2006 | May 24, 2001 |
ERTH vs VTI Performance
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Morningstar Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ERTH returned +5.93% while VTI returned +22.17%. Year to date, ERTH is down 1.07% versus a gain of 13.67% for VTI.
Over three years, ERTH compounded at +1.51% per year against +21.93% for VTI; over five years the annualized figures are -4.88% and +12.51% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, VTI has the edge at +8.11% annualized vs +4.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ERTH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.7% compared with 15.3% for VTI. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -64.5% for ERTH and -56.6% for VTI. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.85. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ERTH charges 0.66% per year while VTI charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $3 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ERTH currently yields 1.96% against 1.07% for VTI.
Holdings Overlap
ERTH and VTI share 27 holdings out of 2933 unique holdings combined, representing a 6.3% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ERTH or VTI?
ERTH has an expense ratio of 0.66% while VTI charges 0.03%. VTI is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $63 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ERTH or VTI?
Over the past year ERTH returned +5.93% vs +22.17% for VTI, so VTI leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), ERTH annualized +4.35% vs +8.11% for VTI. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ERTH or VTI?
ERTH has been the more volatile fund at 22.7% annualized versus 15.3% for VTI. Worst drawdown: ERTH -64.5% vs VTI -56.6%.
Should I hold both ERTH and VTI?
ERTH and VTI have a monthly-return correlation of 0.85, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ERTH and VTI?
ERTH and VTI share 27 common holdings with a 6.3% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 2933 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ERTH or VTI?
ERTH yields 1.96% while VTI yields 1.07%, so ERTH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.