ERTH vs VOO

ERTH vs VOO

Which is better, ERTH or VOO?

VOO has been ahead.

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ERTH is less concentrated, with 35.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%.

Lower Fees: VOOHigher Returns: VOOLess Concentrated: ERTH

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricERTHVOO
Expense Ratio0.66%0.03%Best
AUM$134M$997.4B
Dividend Yield1.96%1.08%
Holdings196509
YTD Return-3.66%+13.37%Best
1Y Return+4.00%+20.08%Best
3Y Return (annualized)-0.26%+21.29%Best
5Y Return (annualized)-6.44%+12.89%Best
Volatility (annualized)20.0%14.1%Best
Max Drawdown-51.8%-34.3%Best
$10,000 over 5 years$7,169$18,335Best
Top 10 Weight35.7%Best36.4%
Fund FamilyInvesco (US)Vanguard (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap BlendLarge Cap Blend
InceptionOct 24, 2006Sep 7, 2010

Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 9, 2010 to Sep 4, 2026 (16 years).

ERTH vs VOO growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 16 years both funds cover.

ERTH vs VOO Performance

Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is an ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ERTH returned +4.00% while VOO returned +20.08%. Year to date, ERTH is down 3.66% versus a gain of 13.37% for VOO.

Over three years, ERTH compounded at -0.26% per year against +21.29% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are -6.44% and +12.89% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VOO has the edge at +13.48% annualized vs +5.88%.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns

ERTH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.0% compared with 14.1% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.

The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -51.8% for ERTH and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.

The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ERTH charges 0.66% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $3 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ERTH currently yields 1.96% against 1.08% for VOO.

Holdings Overlap

ERTH already in VOO20.3%
VOO already in ERTH9.5%

20.3% of ERTH's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 9.5% of VOO's money is in holdings ERTH also owns.

ERTH and VOO share little of their money.

5 positions in common, counted across the 174 positions we hold weights for in ERTH and 505 in VOO, against full books of 196 and 509.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 492 positions for VOO that do not appear in our book for ERTH (90.0% of the fund), and 42 for ERTH that do not appear in VOO (22.3%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ERTHWeight in VOODifference
NVDANvidia Corp.4.81%7.51%2.70%
TSLATesla Motors Inc4.09%1.84%2.25%
DLRDigital Realty Trust Inc.5.27%0.09%5.18%
FSLRFirst Solar, Inc3.46%0.04%3.42%
WYWeyerhaeuser Co.2.65%0.03%2.62%

20.3% of ERTH is already inside VOO.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ERTHVOO

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ERTH or VOO?

ERTH has an expense ratio of 0.66% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option, by $63 a year on a $10,000 investment.

Which performed better, ERTH or VOO?

Over the past year ERTH returned +4.00% vs +20.08% for VOO, so VOO leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), ERTH annualized +5.88% vs +13.48% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.

Which is riskier, ERTH or VOO?

ERTH has been the more volatile fund at 20.0% annualized versus 14.1% for VOO. Worst drawdown: ERTH -51.8% vs VOO -34.3%.

Should I hold both ERTH and VOO?

ERTH and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.

What is the holdings overlap between ERTH and VOO?

20.3% of ERTH's money is in holdings VOO also owns. 9.5% of VOO's is in holdings ERTH also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 174 positions we hold weights for in ERTH and 505 in VOO.

Which pays a higher dividend, ERTH or VOO?

ERTH yields 1.96% while VOO yields 1.08%, so ERTH currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is VOO better than ERTH?

VOO has a lower expense ratio. VOO led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ERTH is less concentrated, with 35.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 36.4%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.