ERTH vs VXUS
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ERTH | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $138M | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.96% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 182 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | -0.02% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +10.04% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +1.02% | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -5.15% | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.7% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -64.5% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 24, 2006 | Jan 26, 2011 |
ERTH vs VXUS Performance
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year ERTH returned +10.04% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, ERTH is down 0.02% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Over three years, ERTH compounded at +1.02% per year against +20.34% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are -5.15% and +9.38% respectively. Across the full 16-year window we track, VXUS has the edge at +4.89% annualized vs +4.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ERTH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.7% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -64.5% for ERTH and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ERTH charges 0.66% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $5 annually, a gap of $61 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ERTH currently yields 1.96% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
ERTH and VXUS share 95 holdings out of 7947 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.7% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ERTH or VXUS?
ERTH has an expense ratio of 0.66% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $61 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ERTH or VXUS?
Over the past year ERTH returned +10.04% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (16 years), ERTH annualized +4.40% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ERTH or VXUS?
ERTH has been the more volatile fund at 22.7% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: ERTH -64.5% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both ERTH and VXUS?
ERTH and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ERTH and VXUS?
ERTH and VXUS share 95 common holdings with a 0.7% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 7947 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ERTH or VXUS?
ERTH yields 1.96% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.