ERTH vs QQQ
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
Quick Verdict
QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ delivered stronger 1-year returns. ERTH offers more diversification with 182 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ERTH | QQQ | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.18% | |
| AUM | $138M | $496.3B | |
| Dividend Yield | 1.96% | 0.44% | |
| Holdings | 182 | 108 | |
| YTD Return | -1.28% | +16.23% | |
| 1Y Return | +6.24% | +26.23% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +1.44% | +25.75% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -5.16% | +14.78% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.7% | 30.6% | |
| Max Drawdown | -64.5% | -83.0% | |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | Invesco (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Oct 24, 2006 | Mar 10, 1999 |
ERTH vs QQQ Performance
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) is a ETF from Invesco (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is a ETF from Invesco (US). Over the past year ERTH returned +6.24% while QQQ returned +26.23%. Year to date, ERTH is down 1.28% versus a gain of 16.23% for QQQ.
Over three years, ERTH compounded at +1.44% per year against +25.75% for QQQ; over five years the annualized figures are -5.16% and +14.78% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, QQQ has the edge at +13.02% annualized vs +4.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
QQQ has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 30.6% compared with 22.7% for ERTH. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -64.5% for ERTH and -83.0% for QQQ. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.80. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ERTH charges 0.66% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $18 annually, a gap of $48 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ERTH currently yields 1.96% against 0.44% for QQQ.
Holdings Overlap
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ERTH or QQQ?
ERTH has an expense ratio of 0.66% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $48 per year of difference.
Which performed better, ERTH or QQQ?
Over the past year ERTH returned +6.24% vs +26.23% for QQQ, so QQQ leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), ERTH annualized +4.33% vs +13.02% for QQQ. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, ERTH or QQQ?
QQQ has been the more volatile fund at 30.6% annualized versus 22.7% for ERTH. Worst drawdown: ERTH -64.5% vs QQQ -83.0%.
Should I hold both ERTH and QQQ?
ERTH and QQQ have a monthly-return correlation of 0.80, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between ERTH and QQQ?
ERTH and QQQ share 2 common holdings with a 7.1% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 273 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, ERTH or QQQ?
ERTH yields 1.96% while QQQ yields 0.44%, so ERTH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.