ERTH vs IVV
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, ERTH or IVV?
IVV has been ahead.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ERTH is less concentrated, with 35.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | ERTH | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.66% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $131M | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 1.97% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 196 | 508 |
| YTD Return | -5.47% | +12.51%Best |
| 1Y Return | -0.72% | +17.57%Best |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | -0.32% | +21.27%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | -6.35% | +12.95%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 22.7% | 15.4%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -64.5% | -56.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $7,203 | $18,384Best |
| Top 10 Weight | 35.7%Best | 37.9% |
| Fund Family | Invesco (US) | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Equity | Equity |
| Style | Large Cap Blend | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Oct 24, 2006 | May 15, 2000 |
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Oct 24, 2006 to Sep 11, 2026 (19.9 years).
ERTH vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 19.9 years both funds cover.
ERTH vs IVV Performance
Invesco MSCI Sustainable Future ETF (ERTH) is an ETF from Invesco (US) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year ERTH returned -0.72% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, ERTH is down 5.47% versus a gain of 12.51% for IVV.
Over three years, ERTH compounded at -0.32% per year against +21.27% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are -6.35% and +12.95% respectively. Across the full 20-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.43% annualized vs +4.09%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
ERTH has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 22.7% compared with 15.4% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -64.5% for ERTH and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.82. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
ERTH charges 0.66% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $66 vs $3 annually, a gap of $63 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ERTH currently yields 1.97% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
20.3% of ERTH's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 9.5% of IVV's money is in holdings ERTH also owns.
ERTH and IVV share little of their money.
5 positions in common, counted across the 174 positions we hold weights for in ERTH and 505 in IVV, against full books of 196 and 508.
What only one of them owns
Our book lists 490 positions for IVV that do not appear in our book for ERTH (89.8% of the fund), and 42 for ERTH that do not appear in IVV (22.3%).
Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.
20.3% of ERTH is already inside IVV.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, ERTH or IVV?
ERTH has an expense ratio of 0.66% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $63 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, ERTH or IVV?
Over the past year ERTH returned -0.72% vs +17.57% for IVV, so IVV leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (20 years), ERTH annualized +4.09% vs +9.43% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, ERTH or IVV?
ERTH has been the more volatile fund at 22.7% annualized versus 15.4% for IVV. Worst drawdown: ERTH -64.5% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both ERTH and IVV?
ERTH and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.82, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between ERTH and IVV?
20.3% of ERTH's money is in holdings IVV also owns. 9.5% of IVV's is in holdings ERTH also owns. They hold 5 positions in common, counted across the 174 positions we hold weights for in ERTH and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, ERTH or IVV?
ERTH yields 1.97% while IVV yields 1.06%, so ERTH currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than ERTH?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. IVV led over 1Y, 3Y, 5Y and the full window. ERTH is less concentrated, with 35.7% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 37.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.