ETFT vs SPY

ETFT vs SPY

Which is better, ETFT or SPY?

Large Cap Growth against Large Cap Blend.

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY is less concentrated, with 38.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.9%.

Lower Fees: SPYLess Concentrated: SPY

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricETFTSPY
Expense Ratio1.00%0.09%Best
AUM$8M$814.4B
Dividend Yield0.00%1.01%
Holdings29505
YTD Return-0.72%+12.71%Best
1Y Return-+19.36%
3Y Return (annualized)-+21.09%
5Y Return (annualized)-+12.69%
Top 10 Weight45.9%38.0%Best
Fund FamilyFundsmith LLP (US)State Street Investment Management
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Blend
InceptionDec 1, 2025Jan 22, 1993

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ETFT vs SPY growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

ETFT vs SPY Performance

Fundsmith Equity ETF (ETFT) is an ETF from Fundsmith LLP (US) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY) is an ETF from State Street Investment Management. Year to date, ETFT is down 0.72% versus a gain of 12.71% for SPY.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ETFT charges 1.00% per year while SPY charges 0.09%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $9 annually, a gap of $91 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ETFT currently yields 0.00% against 1.01% for SPY.

Holdings Overlap

ETFT already in SPY73.0%
SPY already in ETFT15.6%

73.0% of ETFT's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 15.6% of SPY's money is in holdings ETFT also owns.

Most of ETFT is already inside SPY. Owning both mostly buys the same companies twice.

21 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in ETFT and 503 in SPY, against full books of 29 and 505.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 472 positions for SPY that do not appear in our book for ETFT (83.8% of the fund), and 2 for ETFT that do not appear in SPY (6.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ETFTWeight in SPYDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp 4.100 Feb 06 374.31%5.50%1.19%
GOOGL Alphabet Inc. Class A3.36%3.33%0.03%
WATWaters Corp.5.79%0.06%5.73%
MAMastercard Inc4.94%0.69%4.25%
V'visa Inc., Class 'a''4.65%0.92%3.73%
SYKStryker Corp 3.375 11/254.84%0.17%4.67%
METAMeta Platform Inc 2.73%1.94%0.79%
PMPhilip Morris International Inc.3.76%0.44%3.32%
VEEVVeeva Systems Inc Common Stock Usd 0.000013.99%0.05%3.94%
UBERUber Technologies Inc3.77%0.22%3.55%

73.0% of ETFT is already inside SPY.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ETFTSPY

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ETFT or SPY?

ETFT has an expense ratio of 1.00% while SPY charges 0.09%. SPY is the cheaper option, by $91 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ETFT and SPY?

73.0% of ETFT's money is in holdings SPY also owns. 15.6% of SPY's is in holdings ETFT also owns. They hold 21 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in ETFT and 503 in SPY.

Which pays a higher dividend, ETFT or SPY?

ETFT yields 0.00% while SPY yields 1.01%, so SPY currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is SPY better than ETFT?

SPY has a lower expense ratio. SPY is less concentrated, with 38.0% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 45.9%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.