ETFT vs QQQ

ETFT vs QQQ

Which is better, ETFT or QQQ?

QQQ costs less.

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.3%.

Lower Fees: QQQLess Concentrated: QQQ

MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.

Side-by-Side Comparison

MetricETFTQQQ
Expense Ratio1.00%0.18%Best
AUM$8M$498.6B
Dividend Yield0.00%0.42%
Holdings58321
YTD Return-1.35%+21.44%Best
1Y Return-+23.58%
3Y Return (annualized)-+27.86%
5Y Return (annualized)-+16.25%
Top 10 Weight48.3%47.2%Best
Fund FamilyFundsmith LLP (US)Invesco (US)
CategoryEquityEquity
StyleLarge Cap GrowthLarge Cap Growth
InceptionDec 1, 2025Mar 10, 1999

Not shown on this pair: Volatility (annualized), Max Drawdown, $10,000 over the window.

ETFT vs QQQ growth

Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view is available from the range buttons; it is not the opening view here because over the whole period one of these two funds moves so much further than the other that its line would sit flat on the axis.

ETFT vs QQQ Performance

Fundsmith Equity ETF (ETFT) is an ETF from Fundsmith LLP (US) and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 (QQQ) is an ETF from Invesco (US). Year to date, ETFT is down 1.35% versus a gain of 21.44% for QQQ.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Fees and Cost Over Time

ETFT charges 1.00% per year while QQQ charges 0.18%. On a $10,000 position that is $100 vs $18 annually, a gap of $82 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, ETFT currently yields 0.00% against 0.42% for QQQ.

Holdings Overlap

ETFT already in QQQ29.0%
QQQ already in ETFT16.6%

29.0% of ETFT's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 16.6% of QQQ's money is in holdings ETFT also owns.

ETFT and QQQ share little of their money.

10 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in ETFT and 102 in QQQ, against full books of 58 and 321.

What only one of them owns

Our book lists 86 positions for QQQ that do not appear in our book for ETFT (81.2% of the fund), and 12 for ETFT that do not appear in QQQ (49.8%).

Some of those will be the same company recorded under a different code in one of the two books, so the real difference in what you would own is no larger than this and may be smaller. We do not name the individual positions here for that reason.

Top Shared Holdings

StockWeight in ETFTWeight in QQQDifference
MSFTMicrosoft Corp3.85%5.88%2.03%
METAMeta Platforms Inc2.87%3.07%0.20%
GOOGLAlphabet Inc,class A2.63%3.15%0.52%
NFLXNetflix, Inc.3.35%1.44%1.91%
TXNTexas Instrument Inc2.98%1.08%1.90%
ADPAutomatic Data Processing, Inc.3.57%0.48%3.09%
FTNTFortinet Inc3.29%0.50%2.79%
MARMarriott International, Inc.2.97%0.39%2.58%
APPAppLovin Corp. Com Cl A1.80%0.44%1.36%
IDXXIdexx Labs1.68%0.18%1.50%

29.0% of ETFT is already inside QQQ.

You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.

ETFTQQQ

Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is cheaper, ETFT or QQQ?

ETFT has an expense ratio of 1.00% while QQQ charges 0.18%. QQQ is the cheaper option, by $82 a year on a $10,000 investment.

What is the holdings overlap between ETFT and QQQ?

29.0% of ETFT's money is in holdings QQQ also owns. 16.6% of QQQ's is in holdings ETFT also owns. They hold 10 positions in common, counted across the 29 positions we hold weights for in ETFT and 102 in QQQ.

Which pays a higher dividend, ETFT or QQQ?

ETFT yields 0.00% while QQQ yields 0.42%, so QQQ currently pays the higher dividend yield.

Is QQQ better than ETFT?

QQQ has a lower expense ratio. QQQ is less concentrated, with 47.2% of the fund in its ten largest positions against 48.3%. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.