EVT vs IVV
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund vs iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Which is better, EVT or IVV?
Equity-oriented Balanced against Large Cap Blend.
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EVT led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window.
MarketXLS is not an investment adviser. This comparison is generated automatically from market data and is for information only. A Best mark means the better reading on that one measure, not a recommendation to buy.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | EVT | IVV |
|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 1.59% | 0.03%Best |
| AUM | $1.8B | $876.4B |
| Dividend Yield | 6.48% | 1.06% |
| Holdings | 152 | 508 |
| YTD Return | +18.98%Best | +11.57% |
| 1Y Return | +27.37%Best | +17.57% |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +17.95% | +20.71%Best |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +8.40% | +12.80%Best |
| Volatility (annualized) | 20.7% | 14.6%Best |
| Max Drawdown | -77.9% | -56.5%Best |
| $10,000 over 5 years | $14,967 | $18,262Best |
| Fund Family | Eaton Vance | iShares by BlackRock (US) |
| Category | Allocation/Balanced | Equity |
| Style | Equity-oriented Balanced | Large Cap Blend |
| Inception | Sep 30, 2003 | May 15, 2000 |
Not shown on this pair: Top 10 Weight.
Volatility and max drawdown are measured over the window both funds cover: Sep 30, 2003 to Sep 10, 2026 (22.9 years).
EVT vs IVV growth
Month-end closes. Both lines start at 0% in the first month shown, so the gap between them is the difference in growth across that window. The full view covers the 22.9 years both funds cover.
EVT vs IVV Performance
Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Dividend Income Fund (EVT) is an ETF from Eaton Vance and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) is an ETF from iShares by BlackRock (US). Over the past year EVT returned +27.37% while IVV returned +17.57%. Year to date, EVT is up 18.98% versus a gain of 11.57% for IVV.
Over three years, EVT compounded at +17.95% per year against +20.71% for IVV; over five years the annualized figures are +8.40% and +12.80% respectively. Across the full 23-year window we track, IVV has the edge at +9.62% annualized vs +3.48%.
Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
EVT has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 20.7% compared with 14.6% for IVV. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -77.9% for EVT and -56.5% for IVV. Drawdown depth is what each fund did in the worst stretch of the window measured above.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.86. They usually move together, but the gap leaves some room for diversification.
Fees and Cost Over Time
EVT charges 1.59% per year while IVV charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $159 vs $3 annually, a gap of $156 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, EVT currently yields 6.48% against 1.06% for IVV.
Holdings Overlap
At least 24.3% of IVV's money is in holdings EVT also owns.
Stated as a floor: for EVT, our book for it covers 93.4% of that fund, so a holding it does not list is one we cannot count as shared. The real figure is this or higher.
IVV and EVT share little of their money.
The two holdings books were reported 159 days apart, EVT as of Feb 27, 2026 and IVV as of Aug 5, 2026, so some of the difference between them is the time between the two reports rather than the funds.
64 positions in common, counted across the 119 positions we hold weights for in EVT and 505 in IVV, against full books of 152 and 508.
Top Shared Holdings
| Stock | Weight in EVT | Weight in IVV | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMZNAmazon.Com Inc | 2.57% | 4.01% | 1.44% |
| MUMicron Technology, Inc. | 3.90% | 1.51% | 2.39% |
| JPMJpmorgan Chase & Co. | 3.58% | 1.45% | 2.13% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.31% | 2.56% | 0.25% |
| METAMeta Platforms, Inc. | 1.58% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
| CVXChevron Corp. | 2.07% | 0.52% | 1.55% |
| CSCOCisco Systems Inc. - Ordinary Shares | 1.82% | 0.72% | 1.10% |
| BACBank Of America Corp. | 1.89% | 0.62% | 1.27% |
| MMM3m Co. | 2.20% | 0.14% | 2.06% |
| CSXCsx Corp. | 1.94% | 0.14% | 1.80% |
24.3% of IVV is already inside EVT.
You probably hold more than these two. Add the rest and see how much of the whole book is the same companies twice.
Free for up to 10 holdings. No account needed.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, EVT or IVV?
EVT has an expense ratio of 1.59% while IVV charges 0.03%. IVV is the cheaper option, by $156 a year on a $10,000 investment.
Which performed better, EVT or IVV?
Over the past year EVT returned +27.37% vs +17.57% for IVV, so EVT leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (23 years), EVT annualized +3.48% vs +9.62% for IVV. Past performance does not guarantee future results. This is information, not a recommendation.
Which is riskier, EVT or IVV?
EVT has been the more volatile fund at 20.7% annualized versus 14.6% for IVV. Worst drawdown: EVT -77.9% vs IVV -56.5%.
Should I hold both EVT and IVV?
EVT and IVV have a monthly-return correlation of 0.86, so their returns are far enough apart for the mix to behave differently from either one alone. This is information, not a recommendation.
What is the holdings overlap between EVT and IVV?
At least 24.3% of IVV's money is in holdings EVT also owns. Our book for EVT is partial, so the real figure is this or higher. They hold 64 positions in common, counted across the 119 positions we hold weights for in EVT and 505 in IVV.
Which pays a higher dividend, EVT or IVV?
EVT yields 6.48% while IVV yields 1.06%, so EVT currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Is IVV better than EVT?
IVV has a lower expense ratio. EVT led over 1Y, IVV over 3Y, 5Y and the full window. Which one suits a particular account depends on what it is for. This is information, not a recommendation.