FBCG vs VXUS
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF vs Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
Quick Verdict
VXUS has a lower expense ratio. VXUS delivered stronger 1-year returns. VXUS offers more diversification with 8,747 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBCG | VXUS | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57% | 0.05% | |
| AUM | $6.9B | $158.1B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.04% | 2.59% | |
| Holdings | 189 | 8,747 | |
| YTD Return | +14.87% | +15.22% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.19% | +26.86% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.41% | +20.34% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.81% | +9.38% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.0% | 15.1% | |
| Max Drawdown | -43.6% | -39.9% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 2, 2020 | Jan 26, 2011 |
FBCG vs VXUS Performance
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FBCG returned +22.19% while VXUS returned +26.86%. Year to date, FBCG is up 14.87% versus a gain of 15.22% for VXUS.
Over three years, FBCG compounded at +28.41% per year against +20.34% for VXUS; over five years the annualized figures are +13.81% and +9.38% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, FBCG has the edge at +20.46% annualized vs +4.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FBCG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.0% compared with 15.1% for VXUS. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.6% for FBCG and -39.9% for VXUS. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.68. They move independently enough that combining them can meaningfully diversify a portfolio.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBCG charges 0.57% per year while VXUS charges 0.05%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $5 annually, a gap of $52 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBCG currently yields 0.04% against 2.59% for VXUS.
Holdings Overlap
FBCG and VXUS share 14 holdings out of 8097 unique holdings combined, representing a 0.8% weight overlap.
Moderate overlap means holding both could provide meaningful diversification benefits.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBCG or VXUS?
FBCG has an expense ratio of 0.57% while VXUS charges 0.05%. VXUS is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $52 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FBCG or VXUS?
Over the past year FBCG returned +22.19% vs +26.86% for VXUS, so VXUS leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), FBCG annualized +20.46% vs +4.89% for VXUS. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FBCG or VXUS?
FBCG has been the more volatile fund at 23.0% annualized versus 15.1% for VXUS. Worst drawdown: FBCG -43.6% vs VXUS -39.9%.
Should I hold both FBCG and VXUS?
FBCG and VXUS have a monthly-return correlation of 0.68, so combining them can provide real diversification depending on your allocation goals.
What is the holdings overlap between FBCG and VXUS?
FBCG and VXUS share 14 common holdings with a 0.8% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 8097 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBCG or VXUS?
FBCG yields 0.04% while VXUS yields 2.59%, so VXUS currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.