FBCG vs VOO
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF vs Vanguard S&P 500 ETF
Quick Verdict
VOO has a lower expense ratio. FBCG delivered stronger 1-year returns. VOO offers more diversification with 509 holdings.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Metric | FBCG | VOO | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense Ratio | 0.57% | 0.03% | |
| AUM | $6.9B | $997.4B | |
| Dividend Yield | 0.04% | 1.08% | |
| Holdings | 189 | 509 | |
| YTD Return | +14.87% | +14.27% | |
| 1Y Return | +22.19% | +21.79% | |
| 3Y Return (annualized) | +28.41% | +22.19% | |
| 5Y Return (annualized) | +13.81% | +13.28% | |
| Volatility (annualized) | 23.0% | 14.2% | |
| Max Drawdown | -43.6% | -34.3% | |
| Fund Family | Fidelity Investments (US) | Vanguard (US) | |
| Category | Equity | Equity | |
| Inception | Jun 2, 2020 | Sep 7, 2010 |
FBCG vs VOO Performance
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) is a ETF from Fidelity Investments (US) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) is a ETF from Vanguard (US). Over the past year FBCG returned +22.19% while VOO returned +21.79%. Year to date, FBCG is up 14.87% versus a gain of 14.27% for VOO.
Over three years, FBCG compounded at +28.41% per year against +22.19% for VOO; over five years the annualized figures are +13.81% and +13.28% respectively. Across the full 6-year window we track, FBCG has the edge at +20.46% annualized vs +13.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Risk: Volatility and Drawdowns
FBCG has been the more volatile fund, with annualized monthly volatility of 23.0% compared with 14.2% for VOO. Lower volatility generally means a smoother ride, though it often comes with lower long-run returns.
The deepest peak-to-trough decline in our data was -43.6% for FBCG and -34.3% for VOO. Drawdown depth is worth weighing if you expect to sell during market stress rather than ride it out.
The two funds' monthly returns correlate at 0.91. They move almost in lockstep, so holding both mostly duplicates the same exposure.
Fees and Cost Over Time
FBCG charges 0.57% per year while VOO charges 0.03%. On a $10,000 position that is $57 vs $3 annually, a gap of $54 per year that compounds over a long holding period. On income, FBCG currently yields 0.04% against 1.08% for VOO.
Holdings Overlap
FBCG and VOO share 114 holdings out of 633 unique holdings combined, representing a 50.4% weight overlap.
High overlap means holding both may not provide much additional diversification.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is cheaper, FBCG or VOO?
FBCG has an expense ratio of 0.57% while VOO charges 0.03%. VOO is the cheaper option. On a $10,000 investment, that is $54 per year of difference.
Which performed better, FBCG or VOO?
Over the past year FBCG returned +22.19% vs +21.79% for VOO, so FBCG leads on 1-year performance. Over the longest common window we track (6 years), FBCG annualized +20.46% vs +13.59% for VOO. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Which is riskier, FBCG or VOO?
FBCG has been the more volatile fund at 23.0% annualized versus 14.2% for VOO. Worst drawdown: FBCG -43.6% vs VOO -34.3%.
Should I hold both FBCG and VOO?
FBCG and VOO have a monthly-return correlation of 0.91, so they move almost identically. Holding both adds little diversification - most investors pick one, usually on fees or the specific index tracked.
What is the holdings overlap between FBCG and VOO?
FBCG and VOO share 114 common holdings with a 50.4% weight overlap. Combined, they hold 633 unique securities.
Which pays a higher dividend, FBCG or VOO?
FBCG yields 0.04% while VOO yields 1.08%, so VOO currently pays the higher dividend yield.
Popular ETF Comparisons
Get Full ETF Analytics
Access complete holdings data, overlap analysis, screener tools, and more with FundXLS.